VS
Compare BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI) vs BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLD) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZLI and ZLD provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Telecommunications, and Utilities. When evaluating costs, ZLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.4% for ZLD. Performance-wise, ZLI has returned 11.73% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas ZLD is at 12.64% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZLI
ZLD
| AuM | $294.30 M | $33.62 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZLI | +4.91% | +2.15% | +11.73% | +10.88% | +52.69% |
ZLD | +7.05% | +3.66% | +12.64% | +12.79% | +47.37% | |
| Flows | ZLI | +$0 M | -$6 M | -$3 M | -$0 M | -$170 M |
ZLD | -$3 M | -$3 M | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$0 M |
ZLI vs ZLD exposure
Countries
ZLI
Japan
26.37%
United Kingdom
13.71%
Netherlands
9.50%
France
9.19%
Germany
8.86%
Other
32.37%
ZLD
Japan
26.37%
United Kingdom
13.71%
Netherlands
9.50%
France
9.19%
Germany
8.86%
Other
32.37%
Sectors
ZLI
Finance
23.25%
Telecommunications
10.92%
Utilities
10.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.69%
Industrials
10.16%
Technology
9.69%
Other
24.50%
ZLD
Finance
23.25%
Telecommunications
10.92%
Utilities
10.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.69%
Industrials
10.16%
Technology
9.69%
Other
24.50%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZLI
Euronext NV
2.37%
Deutsche Börse AG
1.99%
Orange SA
1.88%
Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.75%
SoftBank Corp.
1.67%
Nitori Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.58%
Insurance Australia Group Ltd.
1.55%
KDDI Corp.
1.53%
OBIC Co. Ltd.
1.51%
SECOM Co., Ltd.
1.50%
ZLD
Euronext NV
2.37%
Deutsche Börse AG
1.99%
Orange SA
1.88%
Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.75%
SoftBank Corp.
1.67%
Nitori Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.58%
Insurance Australia Group Ltd.
1.55%
KDDI Corp.
1.53%
OBIC Co. Ltd.
1.51%
SECOM Co., Ltd.
1.50%
Diversification
ZLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
17.33%
ZLD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
17.33%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZLI and ZLD
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZLI or ZLD?
As of October 30, 2026, ZLI has returned 11.73% year to date, while ZLD has returned 12.64%. ZLD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZLI or ZLD?
As of October 30, 2026, ZLI manages $294.30 M in assets, while ZLD manages $33.62 M. ZLI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZLI and ZLD managed?
ZLI is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZLD is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZLI and ZLD emphasize?
ZLI is most exposed to Finance, Telecommunications, and Utilities. ZLD is most exposed to Finance, Telecommunications, and Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZLI or ZLD?
Year to date, ZLI has seen -$2.96 M in net flows, compared with -$0.17 M for ZLD. ZLD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZLI and ZLD compare?
ZLI has an expense ratio of 0.45%, while ZLD has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of ZLI and ZLD?
ZLI's largest holdings include Euronext NV, Deutsche Börse AG, and Orange SA. ZLD's top holdings include Euronext NV, Deutsche Börse AG, and Orange SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZLI or ZLD?
ZLI holds 101 securities, while ZLD holds 101. On holdings count, ZLI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZLI and ZLD
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.