VS
BMO Market+ Low Volatility Global Equity ETF (ZMLG) and CI Global Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (CGQD.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZMLG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while CGQD.B leans towards Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZMLG features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.45% for CGQD.B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZMLG
CGQD.B
| AuM | $1.65 M | $49.06 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.47% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZMLG | +0.73% | +2.86% | - | - | - |
CGQD.B | -0.44% | +2.49% | +11.93% | +11.27% | - | |
| Flows | ZMLG | +$0 M | +$0 M | - | - | - |
CGQD.B | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$8 M | +$13 M | - |
ZMLG vs CGQD.B exposure
Countries
ZMLG
USA
64.07%
Japan
7.10%
Other
28.83%
CGQD.B
USA
72.60%
Other
27.40%
Sectors
ZMLG
Technology
33.74%
Finance
17.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.83%
Healthcare
11.44%
Industrials
7.94%
Other
16.68%
CGQD.B
Technology
34.01%
Industrials
12.67%
Healthcare
11.45%
Finance
10.15%
Other
31.72%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZMLG
Apple, Inc.
6.74%
Microsoft Corp.
3.91%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.35%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.74%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.82%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.79%
Broadcom Inc.
1.78%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.77%
Analog Devices, Inc.
1.68%
CGQD.B
CA12559L1031
72.48%
CA17165X2014
23.66%
CA17165G1090
3.51%
Diversification
ZMLG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 124 total
27.61%
CGQD.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 546 total
99.65%
Characteristics
Compare
ZMLG
CGQD.B
| Provider | BMO | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.63% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 4, 2026 | September 6, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about ZMLG and CGQD.B
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZMLG or CGQD.B?
As of October 29, 2026, ZMLG manages $1.65 M in assets, while CGQD.B manages $49.06 M. CGQD.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZMLG and CGQD.B managed?
ZMLG is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. CGQD.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZMLG or CGQD.B?
ZMLG holds 124 securities, while CGQD.B holds 1. On holdings count, ZMLG is the more diversified portfolio.
How do the fees of ZMLG and CGQD.B compare?
ZMLG has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while CGQD.B has an expense ratio of 0.47%.
What sectors do ZMLG and CGQD.B emphasize?
ZMLG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CGQD.B is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.