VS
Compare BMO Market+ Low Volatility Global Equity ETF (ZMLG) vs BMO Market+ All Country World Equity ETF (ZMPW) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZMLG and ZMPW provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ZMLG features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.35% for ZMPW. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZMLG
ZMPW
| AuM | $1.64 M | $1.64 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZMLG | +0.04% | +1.14% | - | - | - |
ZMPW | -3.66% | -0.57% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | ZMLG | +$0 M | +$0 M | - | - | - |
ZMPW | +$0 M | +$0 M | - | - | - |
ZMLG vs ZMPW exposure
Countries
ZMLG
USA
64.07%
Japan
7.10%
Other
28.83%
ZMPW
USA
63.33%
Other
36.67%
Sectors
ZMLG
Technology
33.74%
Finance
17.37%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.83%
Healthcare
11.44%
Industrials
7.94%
Other
16.68%
ZMPW
Technology
39.03%
Finance
17.54%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.87%
Industrials
9.73%
Healthcare
9.57%
Other
13.26%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZMLG
Apple, Inc.
6.74%
Microsoft Corp.
3.91%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.35%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.74%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.02%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.82%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.79%
Broadcom Inc.
1.78%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.77%
Analog Devices, Inc.
1.68%
ZMPW
CA05576Y1088
11.48%
Apple, Inc.
5.73%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.32%
Microsoft Corp.
3.81%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.69%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.30%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.07%
Broadcom Inc.
1.63%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.42%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.42%
Diversification
ZMLG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 124 total
27.61%
ZMPW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,329 total
37.87%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZMLG and ZMPW
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZMLG or ZMPW?
As of October 30, 2026, ZMLG manages $1.64 M in assets, while ZMPW manages $1.64 M. ZMPW is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZMLG and ZMPW managed?
ZMLG is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZMPW is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZMLG and ZMPW emphasize?
ZMLG is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZMPW is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
How do the fees of ZMLG and ZMPW compare?
ZMLG has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while ZMPW has an expense ratio of 0.35%.
What are the top holdings of ZMLG and ZMPW?
ZMLG's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and NVIDIA Corp.. ZMPW's top holdings include Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZMLG or ZMPW?
ZMLG holds 124 securities, while ZMPW holds 160. On holdings count, ZMPW is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.