VS
Compare BMO Market+ All Country World Equity ETF (ZMPW) vs Manulife Global Edge ETF (GEDG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZMPW and GEDG provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, ZMPW features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.5% for GEDG. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZMPW
GEDG
| AuM | $1.63 M | $20.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZMPW | +3.14% | +14.23% | - | - | - |
GEDG | +2.33% | +9.54% | +6.21% | - | - | |
| Flows | ZMPW | +$0 M | +$0 M | - | - | - |
GEDG | +$3 M | +$8 M | +$9 M | - | - |
ZMPW vs GEDG exposure
Countries
ZMPW
USA
62.28%
Other
37.72%
GEDG
USA
60.19%
Other
13.59%
Other
26.22%
Sectors
ZMPW
Information Technology
28.76%
Financials
14.48%
Consumer Discretionary
9.53%
Industrials
9.20%
Health Care
8.86%
Communication Services
8.85%
Other
20.32%
GEDG
Information Technology
27.23%
Other
16.46%
Financials
12.86%
Consumer Discretionary
11.66%
Health Care
9.31%
Industrials
9.18%
Other
13.29%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZMPW
NVIDIA
5.32%
APPLE
4.82%
MICROSOFT-T
3.46%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.12%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.58%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.41%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.02%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
1.66%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
1.55%
META PLATFORMS
1.39%
GEDG
NVIDIA
5.75%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.56%
MICROSOFT-T
4.11%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.97%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
3.33%
APPLE
2.82%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.65%
JPMORGAN CHASE
2.62%
LILLY
2.31%
CHENIERE ENERGY
2.16%
Diversification
ZMPW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,362 total
28.31%
GEDG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 55 total
34.28%
Characteristics
Compare
ZMPW
GEDG
| Provider | BMO | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 4, 2026 | November 24, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZMPW and GEDG
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZMPW or GEDG?
As of June 11, 2026, ZMPW manages $1.63 M in assets, while GEDG manages $20.27 M. GEDG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZMPW and GEDG managed?
ZMPW is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. GEDG is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZMPW and GEDG emphasize?
ZMPW is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary. GEDG is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary.
How do the fees of ZMPW and GEDG compare?
ZMPW has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while GEDG has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
What are the top holdings of ZMPW and GEDG?
ZMPW's largest holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE. GEDG's top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZMPW or GEDG?
ZMPW holds 1236 securities, while GEDG holds 54. On holdings count, ZMPW is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.