VS
Compare BMO Market+ All Country World Equity ETF (ZMPW) vs JPMorgan Global Select Equity Active ETF (CA) (JGLO) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZMPW provides Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while JGLO is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZMPW features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.47% for JGLO. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZMPW
JGLO
| AuM | $1.67 M | $263.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.47% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.47% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZMPW | -1.95% | +1.02% | - | - | - |
JGLO | -1.96% | +0.78% | +8.38% | +5.18% | - | |
| Flows | ZMPW | +$0 M | +$0 M | - | - | - |
JGLO | +$12 M | +$59 M | +$215 M | +$220 M | - |
ZMPW vs JGLO exposure
Countries
ZMPW
USA
63.03%
Other
36.97%
JGLO
USA
71.05%
Other
28.95%
Sectors
ZMPW
Technology
36.95%
Finance
18.28%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.33%
Industrials
9.90%
Healthcare
9.67%
Other
13.86%
JGLO
Technology
38.67%
Finance
17.90%
Healthcare
8.89%
Other
34.53%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZMPW
CA05576Y1088
11.34%
Apple, Inc.
5.51%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.04%
Microsoft Corp.
3.81%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.17%
Broadcom Inc.
1.67%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.31%
ASML Holding NV
1.27%
JGLO
NVIDIA Corp.
7.96%
Microsoft Corp.
6.51%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.85%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.02%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.20%
Apple, Inc.
3.17%
Johnson & Johnson
2.68%
ASML Holding NV
2.67%
Safran SA
2.66%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.48%
Diversification
ZMPW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,330 total
37.30%
JGLO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 81 total
40.20%
Characteristics
Compare
ZMPW
JGLO
| Provider | BMO | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.20% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 4, 2026 | July 23, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZMPW and JGLO
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZMPW or JGLO?
As of October 27, 2026, ZMPW manages $1.67 M in assets, while JGLO manages $263.31 M. JGLO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZMPW and JGLO managed?
ZMPW is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. JGLO is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZMPW and JGLO emphasize?
ZMPW is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. JGLO is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
How do the fees of ZMPW and JGLO compare?
ZMPW has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while JGLO has an expense ratio of 0.47%.
What are the top holdings of ZMPW and JGLO?
ZMPW's largest holdings include Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp.. JGLO's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZMPW or JGLO?
ZMPW holds 157 securities, while JGLO holds 80. On holdings count, ZMPW is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.