VS
When evaluating costs, ZPW features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.49% for EACC. Performance-wise, ZPW has returned 7.96% year-to-date with +$19 M in net flows, whereas EACC is at 11.96% with +$47 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZPW
EACC
| AuM | $107.18 M | $108.00 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.63% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZPW | -0.58% | +4.37% | +7.96% | +11.97% | +36.05% |
EACC | -1.32% | +3.50% | +11.96% | +18.48% | - | |
| Flows | ZPW | +$2 M | +$0 M | +$19 M | +$29 M | +$43 M |
EACC | +$3 M | +$12 M | +$47 M | +$65 M | - |
ZPW vs EACC exposure
Countries
ZPW
Other
100.00%
EACC
Other
100.00%
Sectors
ZPW
Other
100.00%
EACC
Other
100.00%
As of September 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZPW
CA05581B1013
96.40%
EACC
CA37962B1031
100.44%
Diversification
ZPW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
96.40%
EACC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.44%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZPW and EACC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZPW or EACC?
As of September 4, 2026, ZPW has returned 7.96% year to date, while EACC has returned 11.96%. EACC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZPW or EACC?
As of September 4, 2026, ZPW manages $107.18 M in assets, while EACC manages $108.00 M. EACC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZPW and EACC managed?
ZPW is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. EACC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZPW or EACC?
Year to date, ZPW has seen +$18.81 M in net flows, compared with +$47.43 M for EACC. EACC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZPW and EACC compare?
ZPW has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while EACC has an expense ratio of 0.63%.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZPW or EACC?
ZPW holds 1 securities, while EACC holds 1. On holdings count, ZPW is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZPW and EACC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.