VS
When evaluating costs, ZPW features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.4% for HHIS. Performance-wise, ZPW has returned 7.96% year-to-date with +$19 M in net flows, whereas HHIS is at 11.89% with +$877 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZPW
HHIS
| AuM | $107.19 M | $1,975.71 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 1.88% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZPW | -0.58% | +5.22% | +7.96% | +12.67% | +36.05% |
HHIS | +2.82% | +2.64% | +11.89% | +18.83% | - | |
| Flows | ZPW | +$2 M | +$0 M | +$19 M | +$29 M | +$43 M |
HHIS | +$60 M | +$338 M | +$877 M | +$1,301 M | - |
ZPW vs HHIS exposure
Countries
ZPW
Other
100.00%
HHIS
Other
100.00%
Sectors
ZPW
Other
100.00%
HHIS
Other
100.00%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZPW
CA05581B1013
96.40%
HHIS
CA41751Y1007
8.00%
CA41751W1041
7.99%
CA41753X1006
7.57%
CA41754L1058
7.53%
CA41757J1075
7.23%
CA41751X1024
7.19%
CA41754U1057
6.99%
CA4175171095
6.67%
CA4179141086
5.56%
CA4175521067
4.81%
Diversification
ZPW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
96.40%
HHIS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
69.55%
Characteristics
Compare
ZPW
HHIS
| Provider | BMO | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.44% | 28.52% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 2, 2015 | January 16, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZPW and HHIS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZPW or HHIS?
As of September 3, 2026, ZPW has returned 7.96% year to date, while HHIS has returned 11.89%. HHIS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZPW or HHIS?
As of September 3, 2026, ZPW manages $107.19 M in assets, while HHIS manages $1.98 B. HHIS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZPW and HHIS managed?
ZPW is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. HHIS is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZPW or HHIS?
Year to date, ZPW has seen +$18.81 M in net flows, compared with +$877.24 M for HHIS. HHIS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZPW and HHIS compare?
ZPW has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while HHIS has an expense ratio of 1.88%.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZPW or HHIS?
ZPW holds 1 securities, while HHIS holds 1. On holdings count, ZPW is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.