BMO US Dividend ETF (ZUD) and JPMorgan US Value Active ETF (JAVA) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZUD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while JAVA leans towards Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZUD features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.44% for JAVA. Performance-wise, ZUD has returned 13.97% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas JAVA is at 18.09% with +$97 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZUD
JAVA
| AuM | $155.65 M | $118.09 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.33% | 0.44% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZUD | -1.57% | +1.02% | +13.97% | +15.41% | +64.23% |
JAVA | +1.26% | +3.21% | +18.09% | +19.72% | - | |
| Flows | ZUD | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$4 M | -$6 M | -$8 M |
JAVA | +$0 M | +$73 M | +$97 M | +$101 M | - |
ZUD vs JAVA exposure
Countries
ZUD
USA
98.27%
JAVA
USA
95.23%
Sectors
ZUD
Technology
32.44%
Finance
15.94%
Healthcare
11.45%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.89%
Energy
8.63%
Other
21.65%
JAVA
Finance
23.76%
Technology
21.03%
Healthcare
12.75%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.87%
Industrials
8.39%
Other
22.19%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZUD
Dell Technologies, Inc.
4.08%
Apple, Inc.
3.98%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.58%
AbbVie, Inc.
3.54%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.93%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.91%
Broadcom Inc.
2.84%
Chevron Corp.
2.63%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
2.43%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.04%
JAVA
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.28%
Microsoft Corp.
5.88%
Apple, Inc.
3.05%
Bank of America Corp.
2.46%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.22%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.81%
Morgan Stanley
1.61%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.52%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
1.50%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.47%
Diversification
ZUD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 95 total
30.96%
JAVA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 155 total
28.79%
Characteristics
Compare
ZUD
JAVA
| Provider | BMO | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.55% | 0.51% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 27, 2013 | March 19, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZUD and JAVA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUD or JAVA?
As of October 19, 2026, ZUD has returned 13.97% year to date, while JAVA has returned 18.09%. JAVA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUD or JAVA?
As of October 19, 2026, ZUD manages $155.65 M in assets, while JAVA manages $118.09 M. ZUD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUD and JAVA managed?
ZUD is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. JAVA is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZUD and JAVA emphasize?
ZUD is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. JAVA is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUD or JAVA?
Year to date, ZUD has seen -$4.28 M in net flows, compared with +$96.64 M for JAVA. JAVA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUD and JAVA compare?
ZUD has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44%.
What are the top holdings of ZUD and JAVA?
ZUD's largest holdings include Dell Technologies, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Cisco Systems, Inc.. JAVA's top holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZUD or JAVA?
ZUD holds 95 securities, while JAVA holds 155. On holdings count, JAVA is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.