VS
Compare BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ) vs Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZUQ provides Information Technology, Health Care, and Communication Services exposures, while ESG is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Communication Services, and Financials. When evaluating costs, ZUQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.15% for ESG. Performance-wise, ZUQ has returned 9.91% year-to-date with -$90 M in net flows, whereas ESG is at 11.12% with +$501 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZUQ
ESG
| AuM | $1,249.14 M | $1,085.84 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.33% | 0.16% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.12% | -0.03% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZUQ | +4.20% | +10.94% | +9.91% | +23.83% | +82.64% |
ESG | +2.88% | +12.91% | +11.12% | +30.40% | +83.68% | |
| Flows | ZUQ | -$0 M | -$5 M | -$90 M | -$111 M | +$268 M |
ESG | +$199 M | +$461 M | +$501 M | +$511 M | +$673 M |
ZUQ vs ESG exposure
Countries
ZUQ
USA
96.13%
ESG
USA
96.07%
Sectors
ZUQ
Information Technology
38.12%
Health Care
14.78%
Communication Services
13.87%
Consumer Staples
11.24%
Industrials
10.52%
Other
11.47%
ESG
Information Technology
40.73%
Communication Services
13.94%
Financials
9.22%
Health Care
9.05%
Other
27.06%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZUQ
META PLATFORMS
5.29%
NVIDIA
5.20%
APPLE
4.75%
VISA INCORPORATION
4.44%
LILLY
4.01%
MICROSOFT-T
3.99%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.19%
MASTERCARD
3.14%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
3.10%
WALMART INC
2.98%
ESG
NVIDIA
12.25%
APPLE
9.56%
MICROSOFT-T
7.59%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.91%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.91%
META PLATFORMS
3.52%
LILLY
1.63%
EXXON
1.56%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
1.41%
VISA INCORPORATION
1.35%
Diversification
ZUQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 120 total
40.09%
ESG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 310 total
47.69%
Characteristics
Compare
ZUQ
ESG
| Provider | BMO | Invesco |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD | S&P 500 Scored & Screened NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.43% | 0.75% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | November 5, 2014 | March 5, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about ZUQ and ESG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUQ or ESG?
As of June 11, 2026, ZUQ has returned 9.91% year to date, while ESG has returned 11.12%. ESG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUQ or ESG?
As of June 11, 2026, ZUQ manages $1.25 B in assets, while ESG manages $1.09 B. ZUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUQ and ESG managed?
ZUQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI USA Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ESG is passively managed by Invesco. It tracks the S&P 500 Scored & Screened NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZUQ and ESG emphasize?
ZUQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Communication Services. ESG is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUQ or ESG?
Year to date, ZUQ has seen -$90.16 M in net flows, compared with +$500.79 M for ESG. ESG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUQ and ESG compare?
ZUQ has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while ESG has an expense ratio of 0.16%.
What are the top holdings of ZUQ and ESG?
ZUQ's largest holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL and META PLATFORMS. ESG's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZUQ or ESG?
ZUQ holds 114 securities, while ESG holds 297. On holdings count, ESG is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZUQ and ESG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.