VS
Compare BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ) vs BMO MSCI USA ESG Leaders Index ETF (ESGY.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZUQ provides Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while ESGY.F is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZUQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.2% for ESGY.F. Performance-wise, ZUQ has returned 16.84% year-to-date with -$74 M in net flows, whereas ESGY.F is at 11.03% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZUQ
ESGY.F
| AuM | $1,341.89 M | $5.74 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.33% | 0.23% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.08% | -0.17% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZUQ | -0.23% | +5.41% | +16.84% | +16.34% | +89.00% |
ESGY.F | -0.03% | +6.06% | +11.03% | +10.46% | +81.81% | |
| Flows | ZUQ | +$6 M | -$11 M | -$74 M | -$59 M | +$306 M |
ESGY.F | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$2 M | -$2 M | -$3 M |
ZUQ vs ESGY.F exposure
Countries
ZUQ
USA
96.60%
ESGY.F
USA
96.39%
Sectors
ZUQ
Technology
46.61%
Healthcare
16.68%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.11%
Finance
10.96%
Industrials
7.83%
ESGY.F
Technology
48.88%
Finance
12.02%
Healthcare
10.72%
Industrials
7.66%
Other
20.72%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZUQ
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.78%
Microsoft Corp.
5.75%
Eli Lilly & Co.
5.46%
Apple, Inc.
5.20%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.85%
Visa, Inc.
4.29%
Johnson & Johnson
3.44%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.08%
Lam Research Corp.
2.96%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.53%
ESGY.F
NVIDIA Corp.
15.11%
Microsoft Corp.
10.40%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.78%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.57%
Tesla, Inc.
2.92%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.86%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.72%
Johnson & Johnson
1.86%
Visa, Inc.
1.75%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.32%
Diversification
ZUQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
43.34%
ESGY.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 248 total
49.29%
Characteristics
Compare
ZUQ
ESGY.F
| Provider | BMO | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD | MSCI USA Selection NTR Index - CAD Hedged |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.44% | 0.65% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | November 5, 2014 | February 12, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about ZUQ and ESGY.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUQ or ESGY.F?
As of October 29, 2026, ZUQ has returned 16.84% year to date, while ESGY.F has returned 11.03%. ZUQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUQ or ESGY.F?
As of October 29, 2026, ZUQ manages $1.34 B in assets, while ESGY.F manages $5.74 M. ZUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUQ and ESGY.F managed?
ZUQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI USA Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ESGY.F is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI USA Selection NTR Index - CAD Hedged benchmark.
What sectors do ZUQ and ESGY.F emphasize?
ZUQ is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ESGY.F is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUQ or ESGY.F?
Year to date, ZUQ has seen -$73.80 M in net flows, compared with -$2.40 M for ESGY.F. ESGY.F has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUQ and ESGY.F compare?
ZUQ has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while ESGY.F has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
What are the top holdings of ZUQ and ESGY.F?
ZUQ's largest holdings include Meta Platforms, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Eli Lilly & Co.. ESGY.F's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZUQ or ESGY.F?
ZUQ holds 118 securities, while ESGY.F holds 246. On holdings count, ESGY.F is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZUQ and ESGY.F
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.