VS
When evaluating costs, ZUQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.25% for FCRU. Performance-wise, ZUQ has returned 16.84% year-to-date with -$74 M in net flows, whereas FCRU is at 14.28% with -$983 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZUQ
FCRU
| AuM | $1,341.89 M | $49.90 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.33% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.08% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZUQ | -0.23% | +5.41% | +16.84% | +16.34% | +89.00% |
FCRU | -1.03% | +5.29% | +14.28% | +12.15% | - | |
| Flows | ZUQ | +$6 M | -$11 M | -$74 M | -$59 M | +$306 M |
FCRU | +$13 M | +$20 M | -$983 M | +$28 M | - |
ZUQ vs FCRU exposure
Countries
ZUQ
USA
96.60%
FCRU
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
ZUQ
Technology
46.61%
Healthcare
16.68%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.11%
Finance
10.96%
Industrials
7.83%
FCRU
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZUQ
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.78%
Microsoft Corp.
5.75%
Eli Lilly & Co.
5.46%
Apple, Inc.
5.20%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.85%
Visa, Inc.
4.29%
Johnson & Johnson
3.44%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.08%
Lam Research Corp.
2.96%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.53%
FCRU
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
ZUQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 119 total
43.34%
FCRU
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
ZUQ
FCRU
| Provider | BMO | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 5, 2014 | June 25, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZUQ and FCRU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUQ or FCRU?
As of October 29, 2026, ZUQ has returned 16.84% year to date, while FCRU has returned 14.28%. ZUQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUQ or FCRU?
As of October 29, 2026, ZUQ manages $1.34 B in assets, while FCRU manages $49.90 M. ZUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUQ and FCRU managed?
ZUQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI USA Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. FCRU is actively managed by Franklin Templeton. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUQ or FCRU?
Year to date, ZUQ has seen -$73.80 M in net flows, compared with -$982.85 M for FCRU. ZUQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUQ and FCRU compare?
ZUQ has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while FCRU has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about ZUQ and FCRU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.