ZUQ
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF

Full ZUQ fund page
VS
PHE.B
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund ETF

Full PHE.B fund page

BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ) and Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund ETF (PHE.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZUQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Health Care, and Communication Services, while PHE.B leans towards Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Communication Services. When evaluating costs, ZUQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.95% for PHE.B. Performance-wise, ZUQ has returned 9.91% year-to-date with -$90 M in net flows, whereas PHE.B is at 3.57% with -$17 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZUQ
+4.20%+10.94%+9.91%+23.83%+82.64%
PHE.B
+2.29%+5.21%+3.57%+14.31%+46.00%
Flows
ZUQ
-$0 M-$5 M-$90 M-$111 M+$268 M
PHE.B
-$1 M-$18 M-$17 M-$15 M-$12 M

ZUQ vs PHE.B exposure

Countries

ZUQ
USA
96.13%
PHE.B
USA
92.99%
Other
7.01%

Sectors

ZUQ
Information Technology
38.12%
Health Care
14.78%
Communication Services
13.87%
Consumer Staples
11.24%
Industrials
10.52%
Other
11.47%
PHE.B
Information Technology
34.80%
Consumer Discretionary
11.48%
Communication Services
11.08%
Financials
10.14%
Industrials
9.67%
Health Care
7.78%
Other
15.05%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZUQ
META PLATFORMS
5.29%
NVIDIA
5.20%
APPLE
4.75%
VISA INCORPORATION
4.44%
LILLY
4.01%
MICROSOFT-T
3.99%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.19%
MASTERCARD
3.14%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
3.10%
WALMART INC
2.98%
PHE.B
NVIDIA
9.65%
APPLE
7.45%
ALPHABET INC-CL
7.26%
MICROSOFT-T
5.57%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.87%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.60%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
JPMORGAN CHASE
2.20%
VISA INCORPORATION
2.04%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
1.98%

Diversification

ZUQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 120 total
40.09%
PHE.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 80 total
46.02%

Characteristics

Compare
ZUQ
PHE.B
ProviderBMOPurpose Investments
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkMSCI USA Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.43%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 5, 2014April 29, 2014

Frequently asked questions about ZUQ and PHE.B

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUQ or PHE.B?
As of June 11, 2026, ZUQ has returned 9.91% year to date, while PHE.B has returned 3.57%. ZUQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUQ or PHE.B?
As of June 11, 2026, ZUQ manages $1.25 B in assets, while PHE.B manages $6.82 M. ZUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUQ and PHE.B managed?
ZUQ is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI USA Quality Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. PHE.B is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZUQ and PHE.B emphasize?
ZUQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Communication Services. PHE.B is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Communication Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUQ or PHE.B?
Year to date, ZUQ has seen -$90.16 M in net flows, compared with -$16.53 M for PHE.B. PHE.B has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUQ and PHE.B compare?
ZUQ has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while PHE.B has an expense ratio of 0.94%.
What are the top holdings of ZUQ and PHE.B?
ZUQ's largest holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL and META PLATFORMS. PHE.B's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZUQ or PHE.B?
ZUQ holds 114 securities, while PHE.B holds 78. On holdings count, ZUQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZUQ and PHE.B

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds