VS
Compare BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZUT provides Utilities exposures, while HBNK is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, ZUT features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, ZUT has returned 17.29% year-to-date with -$87 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 4.26% with -$244 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZUT
HBNK
| AuM | $863.56 M | $823.94 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.74% | -0.37% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZUT | +7.59% | +16.38% | +17.29% | +41.42% | +41.26% |
HBNK | +0.90% | +3.13% | +4.26% | +65.79% | - | |
| Flows | ZUT | -$4 M | -$85 M | -$87 M | +$76 M | +$227 M |
HBNK | -$151 M | -$243 M | -$244 M | -$505 M | - |
ZUT vs HBNK exposure
Countries
ZUT
Canada
82.74%
Bermuda
17.26%
HBNK
Canada
99.69%
Sectors
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
HBNK
Financials
99.69%
As of April 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZUT
BROOKFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP UNIT
8.73%
ATCO
8.70%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
8.53%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
8.28%
ALGONQUIN POWER
8.23%
HYDRO ONE
7.94%
FORTIS
7.66%
ALTAGAS
7.40%
EMERA
7.26%
CAPITAL POWER
7.12%
HBNK
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.58%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.35%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.25%
BNS
16.27%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.76%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.48%
Diversification
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.85%
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.69%
Characteristics
Compare
ZUT
HBNK
| Provider | BMO | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.88% | 3.15% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 19, 2010 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about ZUT and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUT or HBNK?
As of April 6, 2026, ZUT has returned 17.29% year to date, while HBNK has returned 4.26%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUT or HBNK?
As of April 6, 2026, ZUT manages $863.56 M in assets, while HBNK manages $823.94 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUT and HBNK managed?
ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZUT and HBNK emphasize?
ZUT is most exposed to Utilities. HBNK is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUT or HBNK?
Year to date, ZUT has seen -$86.71 M in net flows, compared with -$243.78 M for HBNK. ZUT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUT and HBNK compare?
ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of ZUT and HBNK?
ZUT's largest holdings include BROOKFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP UNIT, ATCO, and BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS. HBNK's top holdings include NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZUT or HBNK?
ZUT holds 13 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, ZUT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZUT and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.