VS
Compare BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZUT provides Utilities, Energy, and Industrials exposures, while HEWB is primarily weighted in Finance. When evaluating costs, ZUT features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, ZUT has returned 13.96% year-to-date with -$57 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 28.27% with +$31 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZUT
HEWB
| AuM | $858.45 M | $341.85 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.73% | -0.70% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZUT | +1.01% | -5.23% | +13.96% | +13.09% | +70.09% |
HEWB | -1.54% | -1.46% | +28.27% | +43.51% | +164.44% | |
| Flows | ZUT | +$36 M | +$79 M | -$57 M | -$37 M | +$265 M |
HEWB | +$4 M | +$11 M | +$31 M | +$30 M | +$37 M |
ZUT vs HEWB exposure
Countries
ZUT
Canada
82.83%
Bermuda
17.17%
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
ZUT
Utilities
82.26%
Energy
9.30%
Industrials
8.44%
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZUT
AltaGas Ltd.
9.30%
ATCO Ltd.
9.15%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.78%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.73%
Capital Power Corp.
8.69%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.44%
Northland Power, Inc.
8.00%
TransAlta Corp.
7.98%
Emera, Inc.
7.97%
Fortis, Inc.
7.90%
HEWB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.93%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
ZUT
HEWB
| Provider | BMO | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.91% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 19, 2010 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about ZUT and HEWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUT or HEWB?
As of October 2, 2026, ZUT has returned 13.96% year to date, while HEWB has returned 28.27%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUT or HEWB?
As of October 2, 2026, ZUT manages $858.45 M in assets, while HEWB manages $341.85 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUT and HEWB managed?
ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZUT and HEWB emphasize?
ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. HEWB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUT or HEWB?
Year to date, ZUT has seen -$57.14 M in net flows, compared with +$30.73 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUT and HEWB compare?
ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of ZUT and HEWB?
ZUT's largest holdings include AltaGas Ltd., ATCO Ltd., and Canadian Utilities Ltd.. HEWB's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Royal Bank of Canada.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZUT or HEWB?
ZUT holds 12 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, ZUT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZUT and HEWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.