ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page
VS
HEWB
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HEWB fund page

Compare BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index Corporate Class ETF (HEWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZUT provides Utilities exposures, while HEWB is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, ZUT features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, ZUT has returned 19.12% year-to-date with -$79 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 22.68% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 9, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZUT
+2.60%+9.46%+19.12%+28.62%+45.24%
HEWB
+6.77%+19.79%+22.68%+64.03%+142.06%
Flows
ZUT
-$18 M+$4 M-$79 M+$122 M+$228 M
HEWB
+$0 M+$8 M+$12 M+$9 M+$14 M

ZUT vs HEWB exposure

Countries

ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%
HEWB
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
HEWB
Financials
99.99%
As of June 9, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%
HEWB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.10%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.90%
BNS
16.65%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.51%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.48%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.35%

Diversification

ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
ZUT
HEWB
ProviderBMOGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.80%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 19, 2010January 23, 2019

Frequently asked questions about ZUT and HEWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUT or HEWB?
As of June 9, 2026, ZUT has returned 19.12% year to date, while HEWB has returned 22.68%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUT or HEWB?
As of June 9, 2026, ZUT manages $880.48 M in assets, while HEWB manages $309.63 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUT and HEWB managed?
ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZUT and HEWB emphasize?
ZUT is most exposed to Utilities. HEWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUT or HEWB?
Year to date, ZUT has seen -$79.22 M in net flows, compared with +$12.25 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUT and HEWB compare?
ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of ZUT and HEWB?
ZUT's largest holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and ALTAGAS. HEWB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZUT or HEWB?
ZUT holds 13 securities, while HEWB holds 6. On holdings count, ZUT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZUT and HEWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds