ZWC
BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full ZWC fund page
VS
CRQ
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF

Full CRQ fund page

BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC) and iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZWC focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Energy, and Materials, while CRQ leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, ZWC features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for CRQ. Performance-wise, ZWC has returned 12.7% year-to-date with +$212 M in net flows, whereas CRQ is at 18.03% with +$10 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZWC
+2.22%+6.78%+12.70%+29.29%+64.10%
CRQ
+4.27%+11.30%+18.03%+44.09%+104.66%
Flows
ZWC
+$42 M+$136 M+$212 M+$284 M+$224 M
CRQ
-$0 M+$2 M+$10 M+$7 M-$10 M

ZWC vs CRQ exposure

Countries

ZWC
Canada
98.39%
CRQ
Canada
99.80%

Sectors

ZWC
Financials
37.04%
Energy
23.02%
Materials
10.11%
Utilities
8.89%
Other
7.10%
Other
13.85%
CRQ
Financials
41.62%
Energy
23.53%
Other
9.40%
Materials
8.19%
Other
17.25%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZWC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.17%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
5.89%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.89%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
5.70%
BNS
5.13%
SUNCOR ENERGY
5.00%
ENBRIDGE
4.93%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.99%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.55%
FORTIS
3.36%
CRQ
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.94%
TORONTO DOMINION
7.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.73%
BNS
5.33%
BANK OF MONTREAL
4.39%
SUNCOR ENERGY
4.19%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.07%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
3.79%
MANULIFE-S
3.19%
CA11271J1075
3.17%

Diversification

ZWC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
50.60%
CRQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
49.40%

Characteristics

Compare
ZWC
CRQ
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-FTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield5.56%1.86%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 9, 2017February 22, 2006

Frequently asked questions about ZWC and CRQ

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZWC or CRQ?
As of June 12, 2026, ZWC has returned 12.70% year to date, while CRQ has returned 18.03%. CRQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWC or CRQ?
As of June 12, 2026, ZWC manages $2.35 B in assets, while CRQ manages $146.71 M. ZWC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWC and CRQ managed?
ZWC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. CRQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZWC and CRQ emphasize?
ZWC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials. CRQ is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZWC or CRQ?
Year to date, ZWC has seen +$212.10 M in net flows, compared with +$10.17 M for CRQ. ZWC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZWC and CRQ compare?
ZWC has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while CRQ has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of ZWC and CRQ?
ZWC's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and CDN IMPERIAL BK. CRQ's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZWC or CRQ?
ZWC holds 34 securities, while CRQ holds 90. On holdings count, CRQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZWC and CRQ

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds