ETF Market Canada › ETF Comparison › ZWH vs ZWC

ZWH vs ZWC ETF Comparison

ENFR
With ETF data and analysis by
Cboe
Back to Cboe homepageFR
ZWH
BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF
Full ZWH fund page
VS
ZWC
BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF
Full ZWC fund page

Compare BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH) vs BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZWH provides Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials exposures, while ZWC is primarily weighted in Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, ZWH features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWC. Performance-wise, ZWH has returned 12.58% year-to-date with -$25 M in net flows, whereas ZWC is at 13.06% with +$214 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZWH
+3.48%+9.91%+12.58%+24.67%+48.80%
ZWC
+2.88%+6.52%+13.06%+29.88%+63.97%
Flows
ZWH
+$7 M+$3 M-$25 M-$38 M-$83 M
ZWC
+$38 M+$134 M+$214 M+$287 M+$226 M

ZWH vs ZWC exposure

Countries

ZWH
USA
98.37%
ZWC
Canada
98.39%

Sectors

ZWH
Information Technology
29.76%
Health Care
12.94%
Financials
10.21%
Consumer Staples
9.46%
Energy
9.32%
Other
28.31%
ZWC
Financials
37.04%
Energy
23.02%
Materials
10.11%
Utilities
8.89%
Other
7.10%
Other
13.85%
As of June 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZWH
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.68%
ABBVIE
4.38%
JPMORGAN CHASE
3.90%
EXXON
3.89%
MERCK & CO INC
3.83%
CHEVRON TEXACO
3.82%
CISCO-T
3.70%
BK OF AMERICA CO
3.64%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
3.33%
APPLE
3.32%
ZWC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.17%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
5.89%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.89%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
5.70%
BNS
5.13%
SUNCOR ENERGY
5.00%
ENBRIDGE
4.93%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.99%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.55%
FORTIS
3.36%

Diversification

ZWH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
38.48%
ZWC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
50.60%

Characteristics

Compare
ZWH
ZWC
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield5.82%5.54%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 14, 2014February 9, 2017

Frequently asked questions about ZWH and ZWC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZWH or ZWC?
As of June 16, 2026, ZWH has returned 12.58% year to date, while ZWC has returned 13.06%. ZWC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWH or ZWC?
As of June 16, 2026, ZWH manages $1.14 B in assets, while ZWC manages $2.36 B. ZWC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWH and ZWC managed?
ZWH is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZWC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZWH and ZWC emphasize?
ZWH is most exposed to Information Technology, Health Care, and Financials. ZWC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZWH or ZWC?
Year to date, ZWH has seen -$25.08 M in net flows, compared with +$214.37 M for ZWC. ZWC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZWH and ZWC compare?
ZWH has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while ZWC has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of ZWH and ZWC?
ZWH's largest holdings include BROADCOM LIMITED, ABBVIE, and JPMORGAN CHASE. ZWC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and CDN IMPERIAL BK.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZWH or ZWC?
ZWH holds 40 securities, while ZWC holds 34. On holdings count, ZWH is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZWH and ZWC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds