VS
Compare BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH) vs BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZWH and ZWH.U provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ZWH features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWH.U. Performance-wise, ZWH has returned 12.91% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ZWH.U is at 10.78% with +$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZWH
ZWH.U
| AuM | $1,149.87 M | $88.78 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 18, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZWH | -0.21% | +0.30% | +12.91% | +16.27% | +44.66% |
ZWH.U | -0.87% | +1.33% | +10.78% | +14.66% | +39.51% | |
| Flows | ZWH | +$8 M | +$21 M | -$1 M | -$10 M | -$95 M |
ZWH.U | +$1 M | -$1 M | +$4 M | +$5 M | -$1 M |
ZWH vs ZWH.U exposure
Countries
ZWH
USA
98.33%
ZWH.U
USA
98.33%
Sectors
ZWH
Technology
31.11%
Finance
17.44%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.70%
Healthcare
9.64%
Energy
8.52%
Other
22.58%
ZWH.U
Technology
31.11%
Finance
17.44%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.70%
Healthcare
9.64%
Energy
8.52%
Other
22.58%
As of September 18, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZWH
AbbVie, Inc.
5.32%
Apple, Inc.
5.27%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.32%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.29%
Bank of America Corp.
4.14%
Broadcom Inc.
4.13%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.12%
Chevron Corp.
3.73%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
3.26%
CVS Health Corp.
3.02%
ZWH.U
AbbVie, Inc.
5.32%
Apple, Inc.
5.27%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.32%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.29%
Bank of America Corp.
4.14%
Broadcom Inc.
4.13%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.12%
Chevron Corp.
3.73%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
3.26%
CVS Health Corp.
3.02%
Diversification
ZWH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
41.61%
ZWH.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
41.61%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZWH and ZWH.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZWH or ZWH.U?
As of September 18, 2026, ZWH has returned 12.91% year to date, while ZWH.U has returned 10.78%. ZWH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWH or ZWH.U?
As of September 18, 2026, ZWH manages $1.15 B in assets, while ZWH.U manages $88.78 M. ZWH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWH and ZWH.U managed?
ZWH is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZWH.U is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZWH and ZWH.U emphasize?
ZWH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZWH.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZWH or ZWH.U?
Year to date, ZWH has seen -$0.97 M in net flows, compared with +$3.90 M for ZWH.U. ZWH.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZWH and ZWH.U compare?
ZWH has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while ZWH.U has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of ZWH and ZWH.U?
ZWH's largest holdings include AbbVie, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Merck & Co., Inc.. ZWH.U's top holdings include AbbVie, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Merck & Co., Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZWH or ZWH.U?
ZWH holds 40 securities, while ZWH.U holds 40. On holdings count, ZWH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZWH and ZWH.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.