ZWH
BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full ZWH fund page
VS
ZWS
BMO US High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF

Full ZWS fund page

Compare BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH) vs BMO US High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZWH and ZWS provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ZWH features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWS. Performance-wise, ZWH has returned 14.09% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ZWS is at 10.26% with -$15 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.0%Aug 21Aug 28Sep 4Sep 14Sep 21

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 21, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZWH
+2.47%+0.66%+14.09%+16.95%+48.91%
ZWS
+0.53%+1.42%+10.26%+13.22%+37.06%
Flows
ZWH
+$7 M+$21 M-$1 M-$10 M-$95 M
ZWS
+$0 M+$0 M-$15 M-$25 M-$82 M

ZWH vs ZWS exposure

Countries

ZWH
USA
98.33%
ZWS
USA
97.11%

Sectors

ZWH
Technology
31.11%
Finance
17.44%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.70%
Healthcare
9.64%
Energy
8.52%
Other
22.58%
ZWS
Technology
30.73%
Finance
17.22%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.57%
Healthcare
9.53%
Energy
8.42%
Other
23.54%
As of September 21, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZWH
AbbVie, Inc.
5.32%
Apple, Inc.
5.27%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.32%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.29%
Bank of America Corp.
4.14%
Broadcom Inc.
4.13%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.12%
Chevron Corp.
3.73%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
3.26%
CVS Health Corp.
3.02%
ZWS
AbbVie, Inc.
5.25%
Apple, Inc.
5.21%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.24%
Bank of America Corp.
4.09%
Broadcom Inc.
4.08%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.07%
Chevron Corp.
3.68%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
3.22%
CVS Health Corp.
2.98%

Diversification

ZWH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
41.61%
ZWS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
41.09%

Characteristics

Compare
ZWH
ZWS
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield5.95%6.01%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 14, 2014March 7, 2018

Frequently asked questions about ZWH and ZWS

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZWH or ZWS?
As of September 21, 2026, ZWH has returned 14.09% year to date, while ZWS has returned 10.26%. ZWH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWH or ZWS?
As of September 21, 2026, ZWH manages $1.16 B in assets, while ZWS manages $120.88 M. ZWH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWH and ZWS managed?
ZWH is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZWS is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZWH and ZWS emphasize?
ZWH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZWS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZWH or ZWS?
Year to date, ZWH has seen -$0.97 M in net flows, compared with -$15.05 M for ZWS. ZWH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZWH and ZWS compare?
ZWH has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while ZWS has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of ZWH and ZWS?
ZWH's largest holdings include AbbVie, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Merck & Co., Inc.. ZWS's top holdings include AbbVie, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Merck & Co., Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZWH or ZWS?
ZWH holds 40 securities, while ZWS holds 40. On holdings count, ZWH is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZWH and ZWS

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds