ZWH
BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full ZWH fund page
VS
ZWU
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF

Full ZWU fund page

Compare BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH) vs BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZWH provides Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while ZWU is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications. When evaluating costs, ZWH features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWU. Performance-wise, ZWH has returned 12.74% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZWU is at 5.98% with +$190 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Aug 14Aug 21Aug 28Sep 4Sep 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 14, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZWH
-0.71%+0.09%+12.74%+17.06%+43.02%
ZWU
-3.57%-5.30%+5.98%+6.46%+34.21%
Flows
ZWH
+$11 M+$25 M+$0 M-$15 M-$94 M
ZWU
+$32 M+$105 M+$190 M+$304 M+$343 M

ZWH vs ZWU exposure

Countries

ZWH
USA
98.33%
ZWU
Canada
56.27%
USA
38.93%

Sectors

ZWH
Technology
31.11%
Finance
17.44%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.70%
Healthcare
9.64%
Energy
8.52%
Other
22.58%
ZWU
Utilities
48.37%
Energy
26.85%
Telecommunications
20.39%
As of September 14, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZWH
AbbVie, Inc.
5.32%
Apple, Inc.
5.27%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.32%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.29%
Bank of America Corp.
4.14%
Broadcom Inc.
4.13%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.12%
Chevron Corp.
3.73%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
3.26%
CVS Health Corp.
3.02%
ZWU
Fortis, Inc.
5.53%
Hydro One Ltd.
5.47%
TC Energy Corp.
5.24%
Enbridge, Inc.
5.15%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
5.00%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
4.74%
Emera, Inc.
4.57%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
4.40%
AT&T, Inc.
4.22%
The Southern Co.
3.93%

Diversification

ZWH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
41.61%
ZWU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
48.25%

Characteristics

Compare
ZWH
ZWU
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.02%7.51%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 14, 2014October 27, 2011

Frequently asked questions about ZWH and ZWU

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZWH or ZWU?
As of September 14, 2026, ZWH has returned 12.74% year to date, while ZWU has returned 5.98%. ZWH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWH or ZWU?
As of September 14, 2026, ZWH manages $1.15 B in assets, while ZWU manages $2.16 B. ZWU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWH and ZWU managed?
ZWH is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZWU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZWH and ZWU emphasize?
ZWH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZWU is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZWH or ZWU?
Year to date, ZWH has seen +$0.36 M in net flows, compared with +$189.52 M for ZWU. ZWU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZWH and ZWU compare?
ZWH has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while ZWU has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of ZWH and ZWU?
ZWH's largest holdings include AbbVie, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Merck & Co., Inc.. ZWU's top holdings include Fortis, Inc., Hydro One Ltd., and TC Energy Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZWH or ZWU?
ZWH holds 40 securities, while ZWU holds 30. On holdings count, ZWH is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZWH and ZWU

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds