VS
BMO US High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWS.T) and BMO US Large Cap Disciplined Value ETF (ZBVU) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZWS.T focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while ZBVU leans towards Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZWS.T features a management fee (MER) of 0.73%, compared to 0.51% for ZBVU. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZWS.T
ZBVU
| AuM | $2.20 M | $10.57 M |
| Management Fees | 0.73% | 0.51% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.51% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZWS.T | -1.10% | +2.33% | - | - | - |
ZBVU | -0.61% | +12.88% | +18.43% | +32.90% | - | |
| Flows | ZWS.T | +$1 M | +$1 M | - | - | - |
ZBVU | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | - |
ZWS.T vs ZBVU exposure
Countries
ZWS.T
USA
99.37%
ZBVU
USA
94.30%
Sectors
ZWS.T
Technology
31.79%
Finance
15.62%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.65%
Healthcare
10.72%
Energy
8.65%
Other
21.57%
ZBVU
Finance
29.96%
Technology
19.77%
Industrials
10.21%
Healthcare
9.83%
Other
30.24%
As of July 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZWS.T
Broadcom Inc.
4.63%
AbbVie, Inc.
4.54%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.46%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
4.42%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.00%
International Business Machines Corp.
3.75%
Apple, Inc.
3.65%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.62%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
3.57%
Chevron Corp.
3.51%
ZBVU
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.10%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.25%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.54%
Bank of America Corp.
3.53%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
3.24%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
3.23%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
3.20%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.11%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.00%
Morgan Stanley
2.93%
Diversification
ZWS.T
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
40.15%
ZBVU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 53 total
35.13%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZWS.T and ZBVU
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWS.T or ZBVU?
As of July 20, 2026, ZWS.T manages $2.20 M in assets, while ZBVU manages $10.57 M. ZBVU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWS.T and ZBVU managed?
ZWS.T is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZBVU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZWS.T and ZBVU emphasize?
ZWS.T is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZBVU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
How do the fees of ZWS.T and ZBVU compare?
ZWS.T has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while ZBVU has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
What are the top holdings of ZWS.T and ZBVU?
ZWS.T's largest holdings include Broadcom Inc., AbbVie, Inc., and Cisco Systems, Inc.. ZBVU's top holdings include Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZWS.T or ZBVU?
ZWS.T holds 40 securities, while ZBVU holds 53. On holdings count, ZBVU is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.