VS
BMO US High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWS.T) and BMO US High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZWS.T focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while ZWS leans towards Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ZWS.T features a management fee (MER) of 0.73%, compared to 0.65% for ZWS. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZWS.T
ZWS
| AuM | $2.20 M | $119.18 M |
| Management Fees | 0.73% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZWS.T | -1.10% | +2.33% | - | - | - |
ZWS | -1.10% | +2.34% | +7.52% | +13.78% | +30.14% | |
| Flows | ZWS.T | +$1 M | +$1 M | - | - | - |
ZWS | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$15 M | -$38 M | -$82 M |
ZWS.T vs ZWS exposure
Countries
ZWS.T
USA
101.21%
ZWS
USA
101.21%
Sectors
ZWS.T
Technology
32.76%
Finance
17.41%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.88%
Healthcare
9.96%
Energy
7.92%
Other
21.08%
ZWS
Technology
32.76%
Finance
17.41%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.88%
Healthcare
9.96%
Energy
7.92%
Other
21.08%
As of July 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZWS.T
AbbVie, Inc.
5.48%
Apple, Inc.
4.60%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.48%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.39%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.17%
Broadcom Inc.
4.07%
Bank of America Corp.
4.00%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
3.37%
Chevron Corp.
3.35%
International Business Machines Corp.
3.13%
ZWS
AbbVie, Inc.
5.48%
Apple, Inc.
4.60%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.48%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.39%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.17%
Broadcom Inc.
4.07%
Bank of America Corp.
4.00%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
3.37%
Chevron Corp.
3.35%
International Business Machines Corp.
3.13%
Diversification
ZWS.T
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
41.05%
ZWS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
41.05%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZWS.T and ZWS
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWS.T or ZWS?
As of July 20, 2026, ZWS.T manages $2.20 M in assets, while ZWS manages $119.18 M. ZWS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWS.T and ZWS managed?
ZWS.T is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZWS is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZWS.T and ZWS emphasize?
ZWS.T is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZWS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
How do the fees of ZWS.T and ZWS compare?
ZWS.T has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while ZWS has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of ZWS.T and ZWS?
ZWS.T's largest holdings include AbbVie, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Merck & Co., Inc.. ZWS's top holdings include AbbVie, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Merck & Co., Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZWS.T or ZWS?
ZWS.T holds 40 securities, while ZWS holds 40. On holdings count, ZWS.T is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.