ZXLF.F
BMO SPDR Financials Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLF.F fund page
VS
CONY
Harvest Coinbase High Income Shares ETF

Full CONY fund page

BMO SPDR Financials Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLF.F) and Harvest Coinbase High Income Shares ETF (CONY) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLF.F focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Business Services, while CONY leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, ZXLF.F features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.4% for CONY. Performance-wise, ZXLF.F has returned 3.42% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas CONY is at 14.56% with +$5 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510152025%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 9, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLF.F
-1.44%+8.64%+3.42%+6.04%-
CONY
+15.27%+15.70%-14.56%-37.32%-
Flows
ZXLF.F
+$1 M+$2 M+$4 M+$5 M-
CONY
+$0 M+$0 M+$5 M+$9 M-

ZXLF.F vs CONY exposure

Countries

ZXLF.F
USA
96.29%
CONY
USA
100.47%

Sectors

ZXLF.F
Finance
95.61%
CONY
Finance
100.47%
As of September 9, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLF.F
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
11.72%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
11.66%
Visa, Inc.
7.56%
Mastercard, Inc.
5.75%
Bank of America Corp.
5.03%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
3.74%
Wells Fargo & Co.
3.29%
Morgan Stanley
3.14%
Citigroup, Inc.
2.79%
American Express Co.
2.23%
CONY
Coinbase Global, Inc.
100.47%

Diversification

ZXLF.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 76 total
56.90%
CONY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.47%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLF.F
CONY
ProviderBMOHarvest Portfolios Group
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P Financials Select Sector Total Return Index - USD-
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.95%50.79%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025January 16, 2025

Frequently asked questions about ZXLF.F and CONY

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLF.F or CONY?
As of September 9, 2026, ZXLF.F has returned 3.42% year to date, while CONY has returned -14.56%. ZXLF.F is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLF.F or CONY?
As of September 9, 2026, ZXLF.F manages $7.34 M in assets, while CONY manages $12.87 M. CONY is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLF.F and CONY managed?
ZXLF.F is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Financials Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. CONY is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZXLF.F and CONY emphasize?
ZXLF.F is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Business Services. CONY is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLF.F or CONY?
Year to date, ZXLF.F has seen +$3.79 M in net flows, compared with +$5.49 M for CONY. CONY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLF.F and CONY compare?
ZXLF.F has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while CONY has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLF.F and CONY?
ZXLF.F's largest holdings include JPMorgan Chase & Co., Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., and Visa, Inc.. CONY's top holdings include Coinbase Global, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLF.F or CONY?
ZXLF.F holds 76 securities, while CONY holds 1. On holdings count, ZXLF.F is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds