VS
BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK) and CI ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.F) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLK focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials, while QQCE.F leans towards Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZXLK features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.2% for QQCE.F. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZXLK
QQCE.F
| AuM | $26.16 M | - |
| Management Fees | 0.21% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZXLK | -9.99% | +1.99% | +27.18% | +19.76% | - |
QQCE.F | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | ZXLK | -$7 M | +$13 M | +$14 M | +$13 M | - |
QQCE.F | - | - | - | - | - |
ZXLK vs QQCE.F exposure
Countries
ZXLK
USA
97.44%
QQCE.F
USA
94.22%
Sectors
ZXLK
Technology
96.17%
QQCE.F
Technology
74.30%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.92%
Other
15.78%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZXLK
US81369Y8030
100.00%
QQCE.F
NVIDIA Corp.
10.55%
Apple, Inc.
8.39%
Microsoft Corp.
6.68%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.44%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.36%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.82%
Tesla, Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.63%
Intel Corp.
2.50%
Diversification
ZXLK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 74 total
100.00%
QQCE.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
50.83%
Characteristics
Compare
ZXLK
QQCE.F
| Provider | BMO | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD | Nasdaq-100 ESG Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.24% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | February 2, 2025 | November 15, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about ZXLK and QQCE.F
How do the fees of ZXLK and QQCE.F compare?
ZXLK has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while QQCE.F has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What sectors do ZXLK and QQCE.F emphasize?
ZXLK is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials. QQCE.F is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
How are ZXLK and QQCE.F managed?
ZXLK is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. QQCE.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 ESG Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLK or QQCE.F?
ZXLK holds 1 securities, while QQCE.F holds 86. On holdings count, QQCE.F is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZXLK and QQCE.F
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.



