ZXLK
BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLK fund page
VS
QQQT.U
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund

Full QQQT.U fund page

Compare BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK) vs Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund (QQQT.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZXLK provides Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials exposures, while QQQT.U is primarily weighted in Technology, Business Services, and Finance. When evaluating costs, ZXLK features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.25% for QQQT.U. Performance-wise, ZXLK has returned 27.18% year-to-date with +$14 M in net flows, whereas QQQT.U is at 26.05% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10.0-5.00.05.0%Sep 29Oct 6Oct 14Oct 21Oct 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 29, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLK
-9.99%+1.99%+27.18%+19.76%-
QQQT.U
-6.44%+9.28%+26.05%+20.60%+173.96%
Flows
ZXLK
-$7 M+$13 M+$14 M+$13 M-
QQQT.U
+$0 M+$0 M+$2 M+$2 M+$3 M

ZXLK vs QQQT.U exposure

Countries

ZXLK
USA
97.44%
QQQT.U
USA
95.20%

Sectors

ZXLK
Technology
96.17%
QQQT.U
Technology
95.70%
As of October 29, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLK
US81369Y8030
100.00%
QQQT.U
Apple, Inc.
9.90%
NVIDIA Corp.
9.69%
Microsoft Corp.
9.55%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
8.74%
Broadcom Inc.
8.69%
Micron Technology, Inc.
6.27%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.34%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.87%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.55%
Intel Corp.
3.40%

Diversification

ZXLK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 74 total
100.00%
QQQT.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 47 total
70.99%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLK
QQQT.U
ProviderBMOEvolve ETFs
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USDNasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.24%0.17%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025July 11, 2023

Frequently asked questions about ZXLK and QQQT.U

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLK or QQQT.U?
As of October 29, 2026, ZXLK has returned 27.18% year to date, while QQQT.U has returned 26.05%. ZXLK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLK or QQQT.U?
As of October 29, 2026, ZXLK manages $26.16 M in assets, while QQQT.U manages $10.99 M. ZXLK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLK and QQQT.U managed?
ZXLK is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. QQQT.U is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLK or QQQT.U?
ZXLK holds 1 securities, while QQQT.U holds 46. On holdings count, QQQT.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLK or QQQT.U?
Year to date, ZXLK has seen +$13.61 M in net flows, compared with +$1.69 M for QQQT.U. ZXLK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLK and QQQT.U compare?
ZXLK has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while QQQT.U has an expense ratio of 0.46%.
What sectors do ZXLK and QQQT.U emphasize?
ZXLK is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials. QQQT.U is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance.

Recent articles about ZXLK and QQQT.U

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds