VS
BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK) and Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLK focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, while TLF leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, ZXLK features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.75% for TLF. Performance-wise, ZXLK has returned 30.78% year-to-date with +$28 M in net flows, whereas TLF is at 27.17% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZXLK
TLF
| AuM | $43.27 M | $162.33 M |
| Management Fees | 0.21% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZXLK | +7.67% | +37.60% | +30.78% | +57.08% | - |
TLF | +5.35% | +29.32% | +27.17% | +46.25% | +109.03% | |
| Flows | ZXLK | +$4 M | +$19 M | +$28 M | +$31 M | - |
TLF | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | -$0 M | +$10 M |
ZXLK vs TLF exposure
Countries
ZXLK
USA
97.00%
TLF
USA
91.10%
Other
8.90%
Sectors
ZXLK
Information Technology
93.77%
TLF
Information Technology
75.60%
Communication Services
10.40%
Other
9.90%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZXLK
NVIDIA
14.80%
APPLE
12.15%
MICROSOFT-T
9.24%
BROADCOM LIMITED
6.04%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
4.33%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
4.29%
INTEL-T
3.30%
CISCO-T
2.69%
US5128073062
2.39%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES
2.36%
TLF
NVIDIA
7.20%
APPLE
7.00%
ALPHABET INC-CL
6.60%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
5.90%
BROADCOM LIMITED
5.80%
CORNING
5.50%
AMPHENOL
4.70%
APPLIED MATERIAL
4.40%
CISCO-T
4.40%
USN070592100
4.10%
Diversification
ZXLK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 73 total
61.58%
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 23 total
55.60%
Characteristics
Compare
ZXLK
TLF
| Provider | BMO | Brompton Group |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.24% | 5.29% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 2, 2025 | May 20, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about ZXLK and TLF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLK or TLF?
As of June 11, 2026, ZXLK has returned 30.78% year to date, while TLF has returned 27.17%. ZXLK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLK or TLF?
As of June 11, 2026, ZXLK manages $43.27 M in assets, while TLF manages $162.33 M. TLF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLK and TLF managed?
ZXLK is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZXLK and TLF emphasize?
ZXLK is most exposed to Information Technology. TLF is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLK or TLF?
Year to date, ZXLK has seen +$27.62 M in net flows, compared with +$1.79 M for TLF. ZXLK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLK and TLF compare?
ZXLK has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLK and TLF?
ZXLK's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T. TLF's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLK or TLF?
ZXLK holds 67 securities, while TLF holds 23. On holdings count, ZXLK is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZXLK and TLF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.