VS
BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLV) and CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Health Care, while FHI leans towards Health Care. When evaluating costs, ZXLV features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.65% for FHI. Performance-wise, ZXLV has returned 1.57% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas FHI is at 0.12% with +$23 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZXLV
FHI
| AuM | $21.27 M | $122.46 M |
| Management Fees | 0.21% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZXLV | +9.94% | +3.95% | +1.57% | +17.59% | - |
FHI | +4.29% | -0.77% | -0.12% | +10.47% | +17.02% | |
| Flows | ZXLV | +$4 M | +$4 M | +$7 M | +$19 M | - |
FHI | +$15 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | +$16 M | +$38 M |
ZXLV vs FHI exposure
Countries
ZXLV
USA
97.39%
FHI
USA
95.00%
Sectors
ZXLV
Health Care
98.41%
FHI
Health Care
99.59%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZXLV
LILLY
14.09%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
10.54%
ABBVIE
7.10%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.38%
MERCK & CO INC
5.15%
AMGEN-T
3.55%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
3.42%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
3.09%
GILEAD SCIENCES
3.09%
ABBOTT LABS
3.00%
FHI
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.48%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
6.29%
CVS HEALTH CORP
5.76%
CIGNA
5.38%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.19%
ABBVIE
5.08%
LILLY
5.05%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
4.95%
AMGEN-T
4.89%
PFIZER
4.88%
Diversification
ZXLV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 58 total
59.41%
FHI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
53.95%
Characteristics
Compare
ZXLV
FHI
| Provider | BMO | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.49% | 9.06% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 2, 2025 | June 12, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about ZXLV and FHI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLV or FHI?
As of June 11, 2026, ZXLV has returned 1.57% year to date, while FHI has returned -0.12%. ZXLV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLV or FHI?
As of June 11, 2026, ZXLV manages $21.27 M in assets, while FHI manages $122.46 M. FHI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLV and FHI managed?
ZXLV is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. FHI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZXLV and FHI emphasize?
ZXLV is most exposed to Health Care. FHI is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLV or FHI?
Year to date, ZXLV has seen +$6.68 M in net flows, compared with +$22.88 M for FHI. FHI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLV and FHI compare?
ZXLV has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while FHI has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLV and FHI?
ZXLV's largest holdings include LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON, and ABBVIE. FHI's top holdings include UNITEDHEALTH GRP, ELEVANCE HEALTH INC, and CVS HEALTH CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLV or FHI?
ZXLV holds 55 securities, while FHI holds 20. On holdings count, ZXLV is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.