VS
BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLV) and Brompton Global Healthcare Income & Growth ETF (HIG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while HIG leans towards Healthcare, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ZXLV features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.75% for HIG. Performance-wise, ZXLV has returned 9.03% year-to-date with +$24 M in net flows, whereas HIG is at 0.67% with +$10 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZXLV
HIG
| AuM | $39.97 M | $66.60 M |
| Management Fees | 0.21% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZXLV | -2.03% | +7.09% | +9.03% | +21.47% | - |
HIG | -1.43% | +6.63% | -0.67% | +8.32% | +14.56% | |
| Flows | ZXLV | -$5 M | +$17 M | +$24 M | +$35 M | - |
HIG | -$0 M | +$2 M | +$10 M | +$12 M | +$22 M |
ZXLV vs HIG exposure
Countries
ZXLV
USA
97.53%
HIG
USA
81.56%
Other
18.44%
Sectors
ZXLV
Healthcare
97.51%
HIG
Healthcare
90.44%
Other
9.56%
As of September 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZXLV
Eli Lilly & Co.
15.48%
Johnson & Johnson
10.51%
AbbVie, Inc.
7.55%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
6.41%
Merck & Co., Inc.
5.48%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.64%
Amgen, Inc.
3.54%
Abbott Laboratories
3.14%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.75%
Pfizer Inc.
2.43%
HIG
Johnson & Johnson
5.95%
Novartis AG
5.63%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
5.30%
Eli Lilly & Co.
5.26%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
5.20%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
4.90%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
4.86%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
4.59%
Welltower, Inc.
4.45%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4.44%
Diversification
ZXLV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 59 total
60.94%
HIG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
50.57%
Characteristics
Compare
ZXLV
HIG
| Provider | BMO | Brompton Group |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.46% | 8.89% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 2, 2025 | September 24, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about ZXLV and HIG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLV or HIG?
As of September 8, 2026, ZXLV has returned 9.03% year to date, while HIG has returned -0.67%. ZXLV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLV or HIG?
As of September 8, 2026, ZXLV manages $39.97 M in assets, while HIG manages $66.60 M. HIG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLV and HIG managed?
ZXLV is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. HIG is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZXLV and HIG emphasize?
ZXLV is most exposed to Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. HIG is most exposed to Healthcare, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLV or HIG?
Year to date, ZXLV has seen +$23.63 M in net flows, compared with +$9.82 M for HIG. ZXLV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLV and HIG compare?
ZXLV has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while HIG has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLV and HIG?
ZXLV's largest holdings include Eli Lilly & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie, Inc.. HIG's top holdings include Johnson & Johnson, Novartis AG, and Cardinal Health, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLV or HIG?
ZXLV holds 59 securities, while HIG holds 25. On holdings count, ZXLV is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZXLV and HIG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.