ZXLV
BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLV fund page
VS
LMAX
Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF

Full LMAX fund page

BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLV) and Hamilton Healthcare Yield Maximizer ETF (LMAX) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Health Care, while LMAX leans towards Health Care. When evaluating costs, ZXLV features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.65% for LMAX. Performance-wise, ZXLV has returned 1.57% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas LMAX is at 0.9% with +$55 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLV
+9.94%+3.95%+1.57%+17.59%-
LMAX
+7.15%+0.43%-0.90%+10.89%-
Flows
ZXLV
+$4 M+$4 M+$7 M+$19 M-
LMAX
+$10 M+$36 M+$55 M+$93 M-

ZXLV vs LMAX exposure

Countries

ZXLV
USA
97.39%
LMAX
USA
96.00%

Sectors

ZXLV
Health Care
98.41%
LMAX
Health Care
101.00%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLV
LILLY
14.09%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
10.54%
ABBVIE
7.10%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
6.38%
MERCK & CO INC
5.15%
AMGEN-T
3.55%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
3.42%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
3.09%
GILEAD SCIENCES
3.09%
ABBOTT LABS
3.00%
LMAX
ABBVIE
5.40%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.30%
PFIZER
5.30%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
5.20%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
5.20%
MERCK & CO INC
5.20%
CVS HEALTH CORP
5.10%
GILEAD SCIENCES
5.10%
CIGNA
5.10%
LILLY
5.10%

Diversification

ZXLV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 58 total
59.41%
LMAX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
52.00%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLV
LMAX
ProviderBMOHamilton ETFs
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD-
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.49%12.90%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025February 6, 2024

Frequently asked questions about ZXLV and LMAX

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLV or LMAX?
As of June 11, 2026, ZXLV has returned 1.57% year to date, while LMAX has returned -0.90%. ZXLV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLV or LMAX?
As of June 11, 2026, ZXLV manages $21.27 M in assets, while LMAX manages $205.57 M. LMAX is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLV and LMAX managed?
ZXLV is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. LMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZXLV and LMAX emphasize?
ZXLV is most exposed to Health Care. LMAX is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLV or LMAX?
Year to date, ZXLV has seen +$6.68 M in net flows, compared with +$54.99 M for LMAX. LMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLV and LMAX compare?
ZXLV has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while LMAX has an expense ratio of 0.80%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLV and LMAX?
ZXLV's largest holdings include LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON, and ABBVIE. LMAX's top holdings include ABBVIE, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB, and PFIZER.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLV or LMAX?
ZXLV holds 55 securities, while LMAX holds 20. On holdings count, ZXLV is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZXLV and LMAX

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds