ZXLV
BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLV fund page
VS
XHC
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF

Full XHC fund page

BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLV) and iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (XHC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while XHC leans towards Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ZXLV features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.63% for XHC. Performance-wise, ZXLV has returned 9.26% year-to-date with +$29 M in net flows, whereas XHC is at 4.12% with -$45 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of August 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLV
+0.16%+16.71%+9.26%+30.33%-
XHC
+0.22%+10.61%+4.12%+20.01%+16.98%
Flows
ZXLV
+$7 M+$26 M+$29 M+$41 M-
XHC
+$11 M-$2 M-$45 M-$11 M-$89 M

ZXLV vs XHC exposure

Countries

ZXLV
USA
97.92%
XHC
USA
69.39%
Switzerland
10.35%
Other
20.26%

Sectors

ZXLV
Healthcare
97.73%
XHC
Healthcare
96.86%
As of August 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLV
Eli Lilly & Co.
16.57%
Johnson & Johnson
10.68%
AbbVie, Inc.
7.76%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
6.59%
Merck & Co., Inc.
5.54%
Amgen, Inc.
3.41%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.25%
Abbott Laboratories
2.76%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.74%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
2.46%
XHC
Eli Lilly & Co.
10.91%
Johnson & Johnson
7.03%
AbbVie, Inc.
5.11%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
4.39%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.11%
AstraZeneca PLC
3.76%
Roche Holding AG
3.75%
Novartis AG
3.72%
Amgen, Inc.
2.53%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
2.41%

Diversification

ZXLV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 59 total
61.77%
XHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 111 total
47.72%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLV
XHC
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USDS&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.46%1.86%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025April 12, 2011

Frequently asked questions about ZXLV and XHC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLV or XHC?
As of August 5, 2026, ZXLV has returned 9.26% year to date, while XHC has returned 4.12%. ZXLV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLV or XHC?
As of August 5, 2026, ZXLV manages $44.96 M in assets, while XHC manages $532.89 M. XHC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLV and XHC managed?
ZXLV is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. XHC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZXLV and XHC emphasize?
ZXLV is most exposed to Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. XHC is most exposed to Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLV or XHC?
Year to date, ZXLV has seen +$28.80 M in net flows, compared with -$45.40 M for XHC. ZXLV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLV and XHC compare?
ZXLV has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while XHC has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLV and XHC?
ZXLV's largest holdings include Eli Lilly & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie, Inc.. XHC's top holdings include Eli Lilly & Co., Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLV or XHC?
ZXLV holds 59 securities, while XHC holds 110. On holdings count, XHC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZXLV and XHC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds