VS
Compare BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLV) vs BMO SPDR Health Care Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLV.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZXLV and ZXLV.F provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care. When evaluating costs, ZXLV features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.21% for ZXLV.F. Performance-wise, ZXLV has returned 7.03% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas ZXLV.F is at 7.46% with +$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZXLV
ZXLV.F
| AuM | $16.00 M | $4.99 M |
| Management Fees | 0.21% | 0.21% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZXLV | -1.72% | -5.59% | -7.03% | +4.19% | - |
ZXLV.F | -0.17% | -7.05% | -7.46% | +3.18% | - | |
| Flows | ZXLV | +$1 M | -$1 M | +$3 M | +$16 M | - |
ZXLV.F | +$1 M | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$4 M | - |
ZXLV vs ZXLV.F exposure
Countries
ZXLV
USA
97.26%
ZXLV.F
USA
97.26%
Sectors
ZXLV
Health Care
98.29%
ZXLV.F
Health Care
98.29%
As of April 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZXLV
LILLY
13.74%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
11.10%
ABBVIE
7.25%
MERCK & CO INC
5.63%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.62%
AMGEN-T
3.57%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
3.48%
ABBOTT LABS
3.37%
GILEAD SCIENCES
3.26%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
3.09%
ZXLV.F
LILLY
13.74%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
11.10%
ABBVIE
7.25%
MERCK & CO INC
5.63%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.62%
AMGEN-T
3.57%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
3.48%
ABBOTT LABS
3.37%
GILEAD SCIENCES
3.26%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
3.09%
Diversification
ZXLV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 59 total
59.10%
ZXLV.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 59 total
59.10%
Characteristics
Compare
ZXLV
ZXLV.F
| Provider | BMO | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD | S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.54% | 2.39% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 2, 2025 | February 2, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZXLV and ZXLV.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLV or ZXLV.F?
As of April 28, 2026, ZXLV has returned -7.03% year to date, while ZXLV.F has returned -7.46%. ZXLV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLV or ZXLV.F?
As of April 28, 2026, ZXLV manages $16.00 M in assets, while ZXLV.F manages $4.99 M. ZXLV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLV and ZXLV.F managed?
ZXLV is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZXLV.F is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Health Care Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do ZXLV and ZXLV.F emphasize?
ZXLV is most exposed to Health Care. ZXLV.F is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLV or ZXLV.F?
Year to date, ZXLV has seen +$3.13 M in net flows, compared with +$3.00 M for ZXLV.F. ZXLV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLV and ZXLV.F compare?
ZXLV has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while ZXLV.F has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLV and ZXLV.F?
ZXLV's largest holdings include LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON, and ABBVIE. ZXLV.F's top holdings include LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON, and ABBVIE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLV or ZXLV.F?
ZXLV holds 56 securities, while ZXLV.F holds 56. On holdings count, ZXLV is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.