ZXLY
BMO SPDR Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLY fund page
VS
TRVI
Harvest Travel & Leisure Income ETF

Full TRVI fund page

BMO SPDR Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLY) and Harvest Travel & Leisure Income ETF (TRVI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Consumer Discretionary, while TRVI leans towards Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, and Real Estate. When evaluating costs, ZXLY features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.75% for TRVI. Performance-wise, ZXLY has returned 1.02% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas TRVI is at 4.5% with -$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

02468101214%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 19, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLY
+4.59%+9.90%+1.02%+16.55%-
TRVI
+12.72%+11.83%+4.50%+19.54%+39.46%
Flows
ZXLY
-$0 M-$3 M-$2 M-$1 M-
TRVI
+$2 M+$0 M-$3 M-$3 M+$6 M

ZXLY vs TRVI exposure

Countries

ZXLY
USA
96.24%
TRVI
USA
82.20%
Other
11.50%

Sectors

ZXLY
Consumer Discretionary
99.60%
TRVI
Consumer Discretionary
72.10%
Industrials
16.30%
Real Estate
10.30%
As of June 19, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLY
AMAZON.COM INC
27.60%
TESLA
17.95%
HOME DEPOT
5.47%
TJX
3.99%
MCDONALD'S
3.91%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
3.11%
LOWE'S COS INC
3.07%
STARBUCKS-T
2.75%
O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE
1.92%
MARRIOTT INTL
1.82%
TRVI
MARRIOTT INTL
10.30%
HILTON INC
10.30%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
10.30%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP
10.20%
AIRBNB
9.90%
DELTA AIR LINES
6.00%
VICI PROPERTIES INC
4.80%
UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS
4.40%
CARNIVAL
4.40%
EXPEDIA GROUP INC
4.30%

Diversification

ZXLY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 48 total
71.61%
TRVI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 29 total
74.90%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLY
TRVI
ProviderBMOHarvest Portfolios Group
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Total Return Index - USD-
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.64%9.70%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025April 12, 2023

Frequently asked questions about ZXLY and TRVI

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLY or TRVI?
As of June 19, 2026, ZXLY has returned 1.02% year to date, while TRVI has returned 4.50%. TRVI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLY or TRVI?
As of June 19, 2026, ZXLY manages $3.72 M in assets, while TRVI manages $55.16 M. TRVI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLY and TRVI managed?
ZXLY is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. TRVI is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZXLY and TRVI emphasize?
ZXLY is most exposed to Consumer Discretionary. TRVI is most exposed to Consumer Discretionary, Industrials, and Real Estate.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLY or TRVI?
Year to date, ZXLY has seen -$1.52 M in net flows, compared with -$2.77 M for TRVI. ZXLY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLY and TRVI compare?
ZXLY has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while TRVI has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLY and TRVI?
ZXLY's largest holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, TESLA, and HOME DEPOT. TRVI's top holdings include MARRIOTT INTL, HILTON INC, and BOOKING HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLY or TRVI?
ZXLY holds 48 securities, while TRVI holds 29. On holdings count, ZXLY is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZXLY and TRVI

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds