ZXLY
BMO SPDR Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLY fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

BMO SPDR Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLY) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Consumer Cyclicals, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Services, while ZUT leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZXLY features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, ZXLY has returned 0.34% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 17.87% with -$71 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.0%Sep 29Oct 6Oct 14Oct 21Oct 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 29, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLY
+5.00%+3.78%-0.34%-1.90%-
ZUT
+4.96%-2.81%+17.87%+11.38%+78.33%
Flows
ZXLY
+$0 M+$0 M-$1 M-$1 M-
ZUT
-$16 M+$51 M-$71 M+$5 M+$259 M

ZXLY vs ZUT exposure

Countries

ZXLY
USA
97.17%
ZUT
Canada
83.93%
Bermuda
16.07%

Sectors

ZXLY
Consumer Cyclicals
41.24%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
31.41%
Consumer Services
25.05%
ZUT
Utilities
83.24%
Energy
8.44%
Industrials
8.32%
As of October 29, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLY
US81369Y4070
100.00%
ZUT
Northland Power, Inc.
9.17%
TransAlta Corp.
8.59%
ATCO Ltd.
8.53%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.44%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.43%
Fortis, Inc.
8.34%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.32%
Capital Power Corp.
8.27%
Emera, Inc.
8.26%
Hydro One Ltd.
8.15%

Diversification

ZXLY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 46 total
100.00%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.50%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLY
ZUT
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Total Return Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.65%3.07%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about ZXLY and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLY or ZUT?
As of October 29, 2026, ZXLY has returned -0.34% year to date, while ZUT has returned 17.87%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLY or ZUT?
As of October 29, 2026, ZXLY manages $3.67 M in assets, while ZUT manages $871.28 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLY and ZUT managed?
ZXLY is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLY or ZUT?
ZXLY holds 1 securities, while ZUT holds 12. On holdings count, ZUT is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLY or ZUT?
Year to date, ZXLY has seen -$1.32 M in net flows, compared with -$71.39 M for ZUT. ZXLY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLY and ZUT compare?
ZXLY has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What sectors do ZXLY and ZUT emphasize?
ZXLY is most exposed to Consumer Cyclicals, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Consumer Services. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.

Recent articles about ZXLY and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds