VS
When evaluating costs, ACHP features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ACHP
HBNK
| AuM | $2.11 M | $749.00 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.49% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACHP | - | - | - | - | - |
HBNK | +1.61% | -0.32% | +29.75% | +46.75% | +160.36% | |
| Flows | ACHP | - | - | - | - | - |
HBNK | +$32 M | -$52 M | -$481 M | -$592 M | -$111 M |
ACHP vs HBNK exposure
Countries
ACHP
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%
Sectors
ACHP
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ACHP
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%
Diversification
ACHP
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%
Characteristics
Compare
ACHP
HBNK
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Mirae Asset Asia Semiconductor Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.65% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | September 21, 2026 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about ACHP and HBNK
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ACHP or HBNK?
As of September 24, 2026, ACHP manages $2.11 M in assets, while HBNK manages $749.00 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ACHP and HBNK managed?
ACHP is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Asia Semiconductor Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of ACHP and HBNK compare?
ACHP has an expense ratio of 0.49%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about ACHP and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.