VS
When evaluating costs, ASMD features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, ASMD has returned 25.64% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 9.49% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ASMD
XIC
| AuM | $5.40 M | $29,650.44 M |
| Management Fees | 0.90% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.06% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.11% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ASMD | -0.42% | +17.00% | +25.64% | +52.67% | - |
XIC | +2.69% | +2.96% | +9.49% | +33.72% | +87.75% | |
| Flows | ASMD | -$0 M | -$1 M | -$2 M | -$5 M | - |
XIC | +$363 M | +$2,779 M | +$5,533 M | +$7,652 M | +$11,585 M |
ASMD vs XIC exposure
Countries
ASMD
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
99.06%
Sectors
ASMD
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
29.96%
Energy
17.73%
Materials
14.57%
Other
13.30%
Other
24.44%
As of June 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ASMD
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.05%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.38%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.00%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.89%
CA11271J1075
2.78%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.78%
BNS
2.68%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.63%
Diversification
ASMD
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
36.37%
Characteristics
Compare
ASMD
XIC
| Provider | AGF | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.04% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 27, 2024 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about ASMD and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ASMD or XIC?
As of June 5, 2026, ASMD has returned 25.64% year to date, while XIC has returned 9.49%. ASMD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ASMD or XIC?
As of June 5, 2026, ASMD manages $5.40 M in assets, while XIC manages $29.65 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ASMD and XIC managed?
ASMD is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ASMD or XIC?
Year to date, ASMD has seen -$1.96 M in net flows, compared with +$5,532.87 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ASMD and XIC compare?
ASMD has an expense ratio of 1.06%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about ASMD and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.