VS
BMO Global Health Care Fund Active ETF Series (BGHC) and Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that BGHC focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples, while HHL leans towards Health Care. When evaluating costs, BGHC features a management fee (MER) of 1.02%, compared to 0.85% for HHL. Performance-wise, BGHC has returned 0.8% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas HHL is at 5.95% with +$312 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BGHC
HHL
| AuM | $9.43 M | $1,730.54 M |
| Management Fees | 1.02% | 0.85% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.82% | 0.98% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BGHC | +9.21% | +4.30% | +0.80% | +14.50% | - |
HHL | +4.78% | -2.40% | -5.95% | +5.29% | +14.62% | |
| Flows | BGHC | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$7 M | -$112 M | - |
HHL | +$68 M | +$196 M | +$312 M | +$446 M | +$674 M |
BGHC vs HHL exposure
Countries
BGHC
USA
77.24%
Switzerland
9.55%
United Kingdom
7.13%
HHL
USA
84.90%
Other
10.60%
Sectors
BGHC
Health Care
87.36%
Other
12.63%
HHL
Health Care
89.40%
Other
10.60%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BGHC
LILLY
9.10%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.43%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
7.29%
ASTRAZENECA
6.43%
ABBVIE
4.82%
MERCK & CO INC
4.69%
US04016X1019
4.48%
UCB
4.40%
MCKESSON
4.23%
NOVARTIS
3.94%
HHL
MERCK & CO INC
5.70%
ABBVIE
5.60%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
5.60%
AMGEN-T
5.50%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
5.50%
ZOETIS INC
5.10%
ABBOTT LABS
5.00%
LILLY
5.00%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
5.00%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL
4.90%
Diversification
BGHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 120 total
56.80%
HHL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
52.90%
Characteristics
Compare
BGHC
HHL
| Provider | BMO | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 10.37% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 26, 2023 | December 18, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about BGHC and HHL
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BGHC or HHL?
As of June 11, 2026, BGHC has returned 0.80% year to date, while HHL has returned -5.95%. BGHC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BGHC or HHL?
As of June 11, 2026, BGHC manages $9.43 M in assets, while HHL manages $1.73 B. HHL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BGHC and HHL managed?
BGHC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. HHL is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do BGHC and HHL emphasize?
BGHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. HHL is most exposed to Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BGHC or HHL?
Year to date, BGHC has seen +$6.51 M in net flows, compared with +$312.33 M for HHL. HHL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BGHC and HHL compare?
BGHC has an expense ratio of 0.82%, while HHL has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
What are the top holdings of BGHC and HHL?
BGHC's largest holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. HHL's top holdings include MERCK & CO INC, ABBVIE, and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: BGHC or HHL?
BGHC holds 107 securities, while HHL holds 18. On holdings count, BGHC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about BGHC and HHL
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.