VS
Compare BMO Global Health Care Fund Active ETF Series (BGHC) vs iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (XHC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. BGHC and XHC provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. When evaluating costs, BGHC features a management fee (MER) of 1.02%, compared to 0.63% for XHC. Performance-wise, BGHC has returned 0.8% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas XHC is at 1.14% with -$63 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BGHC
XHC
| AuM | $9.43 M | $491.71 M |
| Management Fees | 1.02% | 0.63% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.82% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.63% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BGHC | +9.21% | +4.30% | +0.80% | +14.50% | - |
XHC | +6.47% | +0.19% | -1.14% | +10.26% | +13.40% | |
| Flows | BGHC | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$7 M | -$112 M | - |
XHC | -$20 M | -$45 M | -$63 M | -$27 M | -$110 M |
BGHC vs XHC exposure
Countries
BGHC
USA
77.24%
Switzerland
9.55%
United Kingdom
7.13%
XHC
USA
68.08%
Switzerland
10.40%
Other
21.52%
Sectors
BGHC
Health Care
87.36%
Other
12.63%
XHC
Health Care
89.82%
Other
8.80%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BGHC
LILLY
9.10%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.43%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
7.29%
ASTRAZENECA
6.43%
ABBVIE
4.82%
MERCK & CO INC
4.69%
US04016X1019
4.48%
UCB
4.40%
MCKESSON
4.23%
NOVARTIS
3.94%
XHC
LILLY
9.68%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.24%
ABBVIE
4.88%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.49%
ASTRAZENECA
3.93%
CH1499059983
3.82%
NOVARTIS
3.77%
MERCK & CO INC
3.62%
AMGEN-T
2.49%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2.41%
Diversification
BGHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 120 total
56.80%
XHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 113 total
46.33%
Characteristics
Compare
BGHC
XHC
| Provider | BMO | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.90% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 26, 2023 | April 12, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about BGHC and XHC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BGHC or XHC?
As of June 11, 2026, BGHC has returned 0.80% year to date, while XHC has returned -1.14%. BGHC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BGHC or XHC?
As of June 11, 2026, BGHC manages $9.43 M in assets, while XHC manages $491.71 M. XHC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BGHC and XHC managed?
BGHC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. XHC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do BGHC and XHC emphasize?
BGHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. XHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BGHC or XHC?
Year to date, BGHC has seen +$6.51 M in net flows, compared with -$63.06 M for XHC. BGHC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BGHC and XHC compare?
BGHC has an expense ratio of 0.82%, while XHC has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of BGHC and XHC?
BGHC's largest holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. XHC's top holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: BGHC or XHC?
BGHC holds 107 securities, while XHC holds 102. On holdings count, BGHC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about BGHC and XHC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.