VS
When evaluating costs, BGIF features a management fee (MER) of 1.19%, compared to 1.5% for NNRG.U. Performance-wise, BGIF has returned 8.58% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas NNRG.U is at 40.14% with +$47 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BGIF
NNRG.U
| AuM | $2.69 M | $317.73 M |
| Management Fees | 1.19% | 1.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.17% | 1.79% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BGIF | +0.54% | +1.68% | +8.58% | +14.47% | - |
NNRG.U | -0.50% | +12.72% | +40.14% | +57.18% | +94.98% | |
| Flows | BGIF | -$0 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | -$60 M | - |
NNRG.U | +$9 M | +$39 M | +$47 M | +$11 M | -$136 M |
BGIF vs NNRG.U exposure
Countries
BGIF
USA
42.14%
Canada
14.15%
Spain
8.98%
Other
34.72%
NNRG.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
BGIF
Utilities
44.08%
Industrials
26.12%
Energy
20.12%
Other
9.68%
NNRG.U
Exposure data will be available soon
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BGIF
NEXTERA ENERGY
6.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.28%
ES0105046017
4.89%
TRANSURBAN GRP REIT
4.20%
DUKE ENERGY
4.14%
IBERDROLA SA
4.09%
WILLIAMS
3.85%
SOUTHERN
3.54%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
2.90%
TC ENERGY CORP
2.82%
NNRG.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
BGIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 41 total
42.32%
NNRG.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
BGIF
NNRG.U
| Provider | BMO | Ninepoint Partners |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.79% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 26, 2023 | February 25, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about BGIF and NNRG.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BGIF or NNRG.U?
As of June 11, 2026, BGIF has returned 8.58% year to date, while NNRG.U has returned 40.14%. NNRG.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BGIF or NNRG.U?
As of June 11, 2026, BGIF manages $2.69 M in assets, while NNRG.U manages $317.73 M. NNRG.U is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BGIF and NNRG.U managed?
BGIF is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. NNRG.U is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BGIF or NNRG.U?
Year to date, BGIF has seen +$1.60 M in net flows, compared with +$47.13 M for NNRG.U. NNRG.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BGIF and NNRG.U compare?
BGIF has an expense ratio of 1.17%, while NNRG.U has an expense ratio of 1.79%.
Recent articles about BGIF and NNRG.U
Oil ETFs Rally as Gold and Silver Retreat in Volatile Week
Canadian energy ETFs rallied alongside oil prices last week as sanctions on Russia tightened global supply expectations, while precious metals corrected sharply following record highs and easing safe-haven demand.
Posted on 10/27/2025 by ETF Market Canada inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.