VS
When evaluating costs, BKCL features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, BKCL has returned 24.94% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 28.12% with -$417 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BKCL
HBNK
| AuM | $196.20 M | $806.59 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.68% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKCL | +8.28% | +21.56% | +24.94% | +62.14% | - |
HBNK | +10.10% | +24.68% | +28.12% | +71.72% | - | |
| Flows | BKCL | +$0 M | -$1 M | +$6 M | +$13 M | - |
HBNK | +$16 M | -$168 M | -$417 M | -$668 M | - |
BKCL vs HBNK exposure
Countries
BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
BKCL
HBNK
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.79% | 2.61% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 5, 2023 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about BKCL and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BKCL or HBNK?
As of June 17, 2026, BKCL has returned 24.94% year to date, while HBNK has returned 28.12%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BKCL or HBNK?
As of June 17, 2026, BKCL manages $196.20 M in assets, while HBNK manages $806.59 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BKCL and HBNK managed?
BKCL is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BKCL or HBNK?
Year to date, BKCL has seen +$6.11 M in net flows, compared with -$416.98 M for HBNK. BKCL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BKCL and HBNK compare?
BKCL has an expense ratio of 1.68%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about BKCL and HBNK
How Canadians Can Generate Income with these Covered Call ETFs
A look at Canadian Covered Call ETFs that have attractive distribution yields.
Posted on 10/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.