VS
When evaluating costs, BKCL features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, BKCL has returned 24.94% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 28.06% with -$535 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BKCL
ZEB
| AuM | $196.20 M | $6,306.13 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.68% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.62% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKCL | +8.28% | +21.56% | +24.94% | +62.14% | - |
ZEB | +10.10% | +24.68% | +28.06% | +71.51% | +148.45% | |
| Flows | BKCL | +$0 M | -$1 M | +$6 M | +$13 M | - |
ZEB | +$679 M | +$394 M | -$535 M | -$374 M | -$1,242 M |
BKCL vs ZEB exposure
Countries
BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%
Diversification
BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
BKCL
ZEB
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.79% | 2.36% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 5, 2023 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about BKCL and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BKCL or ZEB?
As of June 17, 2026, BKCL has returned 24.94% year to date, while ZEB has returned 28.06%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BKCL or ZEB?
As of June 17, 2026, BKCL manages $196.20 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.31 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BKCL and ZEB managed?
BKCL is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BKCL or ZEB?
Year to date, BKCL has seen +$6.11 M in net flows, compared with -$534.91 M for ZEB. BKCL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BKCL and ZEB compare?
BKCL has an expense ratio of 1.68%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about BKCL and ZEB
How Canadians Can Generate Income with these Covered Call ETFs
A look at Canadian Covered Call ETFs that have attractive distribution yields.
Posted on 10/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.