BKCL
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF

Full BKCL fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

When evaluating costs, BKCL features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, BKCL has returned 24.94% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 19.97% with -$64 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.02.04.06.08.0%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
BKCL
+8.28%+21.56%+24.94%+62.14%-
ZUT
+3.21%+7.13%+19.97%+27.67%+51.43%
Flows
BKCL
+$0 M-$1 M+$6 M+$13 M-
ZUT
+$0 M+$16 M-$64 M+$86 M+$242 M

BKCL vs ZUT exposure

Countries

BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%

Sectors

BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of June 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%

Diversification

BKCL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%

Characteristics

Compare
BKCL
ZUT
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield10.79%2.78%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJuly 5, 2023January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about BKCL and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: BKCL or ZUT?
As of June 17, 2026, BKCL has returned 24.94% year to date, while ZUT has returned 19.97%. BKCL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BKCL or ZUT?
As of June 17, 2026, BKCL manages $196.20 M in assets, while ZUT manages $901.63 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BKCL and ZUT managed?
BKCL is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BKCL or ZUT?
Year to date, BKCL has seen +$6.11 M in net flows, compared with -$64.28 M for ZUT. BKCL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BKCL and ZUT compare?
BKCL has an expense ratio of 1.68%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.

Recent articles about BKCL and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds