VS
When evaluating costs, BLCK features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.45% for FCIQ. Performance-wise, BLCK has returned 15.03% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas FCIQ is at 16.9% with +$478 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BLCK
FCIQ
| AuM | $2.12 M | $2,009.09 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.81% | 0.51% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.88% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BLCK | -0.94% | +1.19% | +15.03% | +26.85% | +87.54% |
FCIQ | -0.27% | +8.06% | +16.90% | +19.46% | +60.78% | |
| Flows | BLCK | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$1 M |
FCIQ | +$51 M | +$129 M | +$478 M | +$653 M | +$1,138 M |
BLCK vs FCIQ exposure
Countries
BLCK
USA
41.71%
China
10.23%
Germany
7.70%
Other
40.36%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
BLCK
Finance
40.09%
Technology
31.97%
Other
27.94%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BLCK
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.92%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.88%
Intel Corp.
2.47%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.84%
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
1.71%
Infineon Technologies AG
1.69%
Morgan Stanley
1.63%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.59%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.51%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.50%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
BLCK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 98 total
19.74%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
BLCK
FCIQ
| Provider | First Trust | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Indxx Blockchain Index Net Total Return - USD | Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.19% | 1.14% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 23, 2018 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about BLCK and FCIQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BLCK or FCIQ?
As of September 3, 2026, BLCK has returned 15.03% year to date, while FCIQ has returned 16.90%. FCIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BLCK or FCIQ?
As of September 3, 2026, BLCK manages $2.12 M in assets, while FCIQ manages $2.01 B. FCIQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BLCK and FCIQ managed?
BLCK is passively managed by First Trust. It tracks the Indxx Blockchain Index Net Total Return - USD benchmark. FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BLCK or FCIQ?
Year to date, BLCK has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$478.05 M for FCIQ. FCIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BLCK and FCIQ compare?
BLCK has an expense ratio of 0.81%, while FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
Recent articles about BLCK and FCIQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.