VS
When evaluating costs, BNKL features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.65% for HDIV. Performance-wise, BNKL has returned 34.41% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas HDIV is at 19.84% with +$623 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BNKL
HDIV
| AuM | $13.91 M | $1,913.32 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.16% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 1, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BNKL | -0.24% | -2.68% | +34.41% | +54.42% | +214.96% |
HDIV | -0.90% | +1.57% | +19.84% | +26.61% | +124.66% | |
| Flows | BNKL | +$3 M | -$0 M | +$1 M | -$8 M | -$5 M |
HDIV | +$86 M | +$223 M | +$623 M | +$756 M | +$1,197 M |
BNKL vs HDIV exposure
Countries
BNKL
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
BNKL
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 1, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BNKL
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
BNKL
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
BNKL
HDIV
| Provider | Global X | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Other | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.91% | 9.72% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 5, 2023 | July 19, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about BNKL and HDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BNKL or HDIV?
As of October 1, 2026, BNKL has returned 34.41% year to date, while HDIV has returned 19.84%. BNKL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BNKL or HDIV?
As of October 1, 2026, BNKL manages $13.91 M in assets, while HDIV manages $1.91 B. HDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BNKL and HDIV managed?
BNKL is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HDIV is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BNKL or HDIV?
Year to date, BNKL has seen +$1.17 M in net flows, compared with +$623.21 M for HDIV. HDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BNKL and HDIV compare?
BNKL has an expense ratio of 1.16%, while HDIV has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
Recent articles about BNKL and HDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.