When evaluating costs, BTCC features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.75% for EBIT.U. Performance-wise, BTCC has returned 9.99% year-to-date with -$34 M in net flows, whereas EBIT.U is at 9.7% with -$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BTCC
EBIT.U
| AuM | $678.20 M | $16.53 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.30% | 1.53% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.12% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BTCC | -2.55% | +26.40% | -9.99% | -31.06% | +114.65% |
EBIT.U | -3.38% | +26.90% | -9.70% | -31.05% | +121.36% | |
| Flows | BTCC | -$1 M | -$14 M | -$34 M | -$20 M | +$41 M |
EBIT.U | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$3 M | -$3 M | -$39 M |
BTCC vs EBIT.U exposure
Countries
BTCC
Exposure data will be available soon
EBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
BTCC
Exposure data will be available soon
EBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BTCC
Exposure data will be available soon
EBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
BTCC
Exposure data will be available soon
EBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
BTCC
EBIT.U
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index - USD | CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Cryptocurrencies |
| Dividend Policy | No income | No income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 11, 2021 | February 19, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about BTCC and EBIT.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BTCC or EBIT.U?
As of October 28, 2026, BTCC has returned -9.99% year to date, while EBIT.U has returned -9.70%. EBIT.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BTCC or EBIT.U?
As of October 28, 2026, BTCC manages $678.20 M in assets, while EBIT.U manages $16.53 M. BTCC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BTCC and EBIT.U managed?
BTCC is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index - USD benchmark. EBIT.U is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BTCC or EBIT.U?
Year to date, BTCC has seen -$34.25 M in net flows, compared with -$2.53 M for EBIT.U. EBIT.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BTCC and EBIT.U compare?
BTCC has an expense ratio of 1.30%, while EBIT.U has an expense ratio of 1.53%.
Recent articles about BTCC and EBIT.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.