VS
When evaluating costs, CCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.99% for HURA. Performance-wise, CCLN has returned 6.67% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas HURA is at 10.84% with +$50 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CCLN
HURA
| AuM | $1.60 M | $171.50 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.99% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.98% |
| Tracking Difference | 1.06% | -0.93% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCLN | -15.74% | -12.12% | -6.67% | +9.29% | -33.03% |
HURA | -12.08% | -23.16% | -10.84% | +0.16% | +89.22% | |
| Flows | CCLN | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$1 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
HURA | +$2 M | +$19 M | +$50 M | +$73 M | +$88 M |
CCLN vs HURA exposure
Countries
CCLN
USA
84.75%
Canada
9.69%
HURA
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CCLN
Industrials
35.02%
Utilities
27.16%
Consumer Cyclicals
13.26%
Non-Energy Materials
8.36%
Other
16.20%
HURA
Exposure data will be available soon
As of July 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CCLN
Tesla, Inc.
5.83%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.76%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
5.48%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
5.16%
Nextpower, Inc.
4.91%
Northland Power, Inc.
4.90%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.76%
Albemarle Corp.
4.71%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
4.67%
First Solar, Inc.
4.59%
HURA
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 38 total
50.76%
HURA
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CCLN
HURA
| Provider | CIBC | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Select Index - CAD | Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | November 16, 2021 | May 16, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CCLN and HURA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCLN or HURA?
As of July 29, 2026, CCLN has returned -6.67% year to date, while HURA has returned -10.84%. CCLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCLN or HURA?
As of July 29, 2026, CCLN manages $1.60 M in assets, while HURA manages $171.50 M. HURA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCLN and HURA managed?
CCLN is passively managed by CIBC. It tracks the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Select Index - CAD benchmark. HURA is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCLN or HURA?
Year to date, CCLN has seen +$0.97 M in net flows, compared with +$49.84 M for HURA. HURA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCLN and HURA compare?
CCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HURA has an expense ratio of 0.98%.
Recent articles about CCLN and HURA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.