CDZ
iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF

Full CDZ fund page
VS
CACE
Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF

Full CACE fund page

Compare iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ) vs Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF (CACE) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CDZ provides Finance, Energy, and Industrials exposures, while CACE is primarily weighted in Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, CDZ features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.19% for CACE. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 10, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CDZ
-3.02%-0.97%+13.21%+18.00%+72.49%
CACE
-1.36%+5.42%---
Flows
CDZ
-$19 M+$7 M+$9 M+$37 M-$91 M
CACE
+$54 M+$143 M---

CDZ vs CACE exposure

Countries

CDZ
Canada
97.47%
CACE
Canada
97.33%

Sectors

CDZ
Finance
28.58%
Energy
19.61%
Industrials
14.55%
Utilities
9.21%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.32%
Other
20.73%
CACE
Finance
35.63%
Energy
20.88%
Non-Energy Materials
19.01%
Industrials
7.63%
Other
16.85%
As of September 10, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CDZ
South Bow Corp.
3.26%
Mullen Group Ltd.
2.78%
Gibson Energy, Inc.
2.72%
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp.
2.60%
TELUS Corp.
2.39%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
2.24%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.22%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.13%
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
2.05%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
1.83%
CACE
Royal Bank of Canada
7.27%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.29%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
3.02%
Bank of Montreal
2.99%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.96%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.82%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.41%
Shopify, Inc.
2.05%
Canadian National Railway Co.
1.95%

Diversification

CDZ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 95 total
24.20%
CACE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 314 total
33.65%

Characteristics

Compare
CDZ
CACE
ProvideriSharesCIBC
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.06%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 8, 2006February 20, 2026

Frequently asked questions about CDZ and CACE

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CDZ or CACE?
As of September 10, 2026, CDZ manages $1.22 B in assets, while CACE manages $368.33 M. CDZ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CDZ and CACE managed?
CDZ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. CACE is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CDZ and CACE emphasize?
CDZ is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Industrials. CACE is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials.
How do the fees of CDZ and CACE compare?
CDZ has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while CACE has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of CDZ and CACE?
CDZ's largest holdings include South Bow Corp., Mullen Group Ltd., and Gibson Energy, Inc.. CACE's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Suncor Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CDZ or CACE?
CDZ holds 95 securities, while CACE holds 314. On holdings count, CACE is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CDZ and CACE

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds