CESG
CI MSCI World ESG Impact Index ETF

Full CESG fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, CESG features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, CESG has returned 22.92% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 32.46% with -$509 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 3, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CESG
+2.04%+1.71%+22.92%+26.55%+24.05%
HBNK
-0.30%+11.09%+32.46%+55.67%+162.45%
Flows
CESG
+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M-$1 M-$2 M
HBNK
+$7 M-$91 M-$509 M-$686 M-$82 M

CESG vs HBNK exposure

Countries

CESG
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%

Sectors

CESG
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 3, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CESG
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%

Diversification

CESG
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%

Characteristics

Compare
CESG
HBNK
ProviderCIGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI World ESG Select Impact ex Fossil Fuels 100% hedged to CAD Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.27%2.59%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateSeptember 12, 2019July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about CESG and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CESG or HBNK?
As of September 3, 2026, CESG has returned 22.92% year to date, while HBNK has returned 32.46%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CESG or HBNK?
As of September 3, 2026, CESG manages $10.75 M in assets, while HBNK manages $736.43 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CESG and HBNK managed?
CESG is passively managed by CI. It tracks the MSCI World ESG Select Impact ex Fossil Fuels 100% hedged to CAD Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CESG or HBNK?
Year to date, CESG has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$509.07 M for HBNK. CESG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CESG and HBNK compare?
CESG has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about CESG and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds