VS
When evaluating costs, CGLO features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.45% for FCIQ. Performance-wise, CGLO has returned 10.62% year-to-date with -$29 M in net flows, whereas FCIQ is at 18.63% with +$527 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGLO
FCIQ
| AuM | $87.44 M | $2,088.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.80% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.89% | 0.51% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.89% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGLO | +5.61% | +3.99% | +10.62% | +9.46% | +44.27% |
FCIQ | +2.41% | +5.88% | +18.63% | +15.94% | +70.10% | |
| Flows | CGLO | -$10 M | -$12 M | -$29 M | -$45 M | -$14 M |
FCIQ | +$38 M | +$122 M | +$527 M | +$624 M | +$1,218 M |
CGLO vs FCIQ exposure
Countries
CGLO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CGLO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGLO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CGLO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CGLO
FCIQ
| Provider | CIBC | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.12% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 27, 2020 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CGLO and FCIQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGLO or FCIQ?
As of October 15, 2026, CGLO has returned 10.62% year to date, while FCIQ has returned 18.63%. FCIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGLO or FCIQ?
As of October 15, 2026, CGLO manages $87.44 M in assets, while FCIQ manages $2.09 B. FCIQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGLO and FCIQ managed?
CGLO is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGLO or FCIQ?
Year to date, CGLO has seen -$28.93 M in net flows, compared with +$526.57 M for FCIQ. FCIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGLO and FCIQ compare?
CGLO has an expense ratio of 0.89%, while FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
Recent articles about CGLO and FCIQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.