VS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while CIAI leans towards Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.2% for CIAI. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 49.09% year-to-date with +$150 M in net flows, whereas CIAI is at 22.92% with -$144 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CHPS
CIAI
| AuM | $394.35 M | $1,082.49 M |
| Management Fees | 0.64% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.64% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS | -7.17% | +5.29% | +49.09% | +39.93% | +239.33% |
CIAI | -6.03% | +7.12% | +22.92% | +13.05% | - | |
| Flows | CHPS | +$22 M | +$8 M | +$150 M | +$159 M | +$205 M |
CIAI | -$80 M | -$57 M | -$144 M | -$179 M | - |
CHPS vs CIAI exposure
Countries
CHPS
USA
68.99%
Taiwan
17.93%
Netherlands
9.42%
CIAI
USA
79.07%
Other
20.93%
Sectors
CHPS
Technology
99.99%
CIAI
Technology
78.75%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.04%
Other
14.21%
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CHPS
NVIDIA Corp.
22.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.93%
Broadcom Inc.
13.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
10.83%
ASML Holding NV
9.42%
Lam Research Corp.
5.32%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.14%
Arm Holdings Plc
3.65%
KLA Corp.
3.23%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.61%
CIAI
NVIDIA Corp.
11.95%
Broadcom Inc.
7.21%
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.04%
Microsoft Corp.
6.04%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.76%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.39%
ASML Holding NV
4.14%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.00%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
3.44%
Diversification
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
93.58%
CIAI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 43 total
58.50%
Characteristics
Compare
CHPS
CIAI
| Provider | Global X | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2021 | May 2, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about CHPS and CIAI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or CIAI?
As of October 28, 2026, CHPS has returned 49.09% year to date, while CIAI has returned 22.92%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or CIAI?
As of October 28, 2026, CHPS manages $394.35 M in assets, while CIAI manages $1.08 B. CIAI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and CIAI managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. CIAI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CHPS and CIAI emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Technology. CIAI is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or CIAI?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$150.13 M in net flows, compared with -$143.65 M for CIAI. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and CIAI compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while CIAI has an expense ratio of 0.64%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and CIAI?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Broadcom Inc.. CIAI's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Broadcom Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or CIAI?
CHPS holds 18 securities, while CIAI holds 43. On holdings count, CIAI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CHPS and CIAI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.