VS
When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.35% for TEC. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 50.85% year-to-date with +$140 M in net flows, whereas TEC is at 10.29% with +$598 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CHPS
TEC
| AuM | $386.44 M | $4,790.64 M |
| Management Fees | 0.64% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.52% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS | -7.26% | +12.61% | +50.85% | +82.61% | +203.22% |
TEC | -2.69% | +5.31% | +10.29% | +21.89% | +103.14% | |
| Flows | CHPS | +$25 M | +$96 M | +$140 M | +$160 M | +$190 M |
TEC | +$69 M | +$7 M | +$598 M | +$864 M | +$1,118 M |
CHPS vs TEC exposure
Countries
CHPS
Exposure data will be available soon
TEC
USA
89.08%
Other
10.92%
Sectors
CHPS
Exposure data will be available soon
TEC
Technology
81.96%
Other
18.04%
As of July 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CHPS
Exposure data will be available soon
TEC
NVIDIA Corp.
11.82%
Apple, Inc.
10.46%
Microsoft Corp.
6.91%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.78%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.52%
Broadcom Inc.
4.44%
Tesla, Inc.
3.55%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.29%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.12%
Diversification
CHPS
Exposure data will be available soon
TEC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 228 total
59.14%
Characteristics
Compare
CHPS
TEC
| Provider | Global X | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD | Solactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.01% | 0.09% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2021 | May 9, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CHPS and TEC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or TEC?
As of July 24, 2026, CHPS has returned 50.85% year to date, while TEC has returned 10.29%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or TEC?
As of July 24, 2026, CHPS manages $386.44 M in assets, while TEC manages $4.79 B. TEC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and TEC managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. TEC is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or TEC?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$139.79 M in net flows, compared with +$598.16 M for TEC. TEC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and TEC compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while TEC has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about CHPS and TEC
Chip Stocks Enter a Bear Market: What It Means for Canadian AI ETFs
Canadian-listed semiconductor and AI ETFs fell as much as 11% this week as chip stocks entered a global bear market, even as investors kept adding money into the weakness.
Posted 6 days ago by Edouard Caillieux inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.