VS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, while TEC leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.35% for TEC. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 57.94% year-to-date with +$108 M in net flows, whereas TEC is at 12.84% with +$510 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CHPS
TEC
| AuM | $373.90 M | $4,814.98 M |
| Management Fees | 0.64% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.59% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS | +9.86% | +46.61% | +57.94% | +114.45% | +219.87% |
TEC | +1.38% | +19.34% | +12.84% | +32.75% | +113.24% | |
| Flows | CHPS | +$46 M | +$81 M | +$108 M | +$129 M | +$157 M |
TEC | -$92 M | +$244 M | +$510 M | +$705 M | +$1,249 M |
CHPS vs TEC exposure
Countries
CHPS
USA
87.93%
Other
12.07%
TEC
USA
88.13%
Other
11.87%
Sectors
CHPS
Information Technology
57.60%
Other
42.40%
TEC
Information Technology
64.10%
Communication Services
16.37%
Consumer Discretionary
12.01%
Other
7.52%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CHPS
NVIDIA
19.14%
BROADCOM LIMITED
16.16%
US8740391003
14.87%
USN070592100
9.77%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
9.66%
US5128073062
5.69%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.63%
KLA CORPORATION
4.31%
QUALCOMM
2.70%
TEC
NVIDIA
13.79%
APPLE
10.50%
MICROSOFT-T
8.50%
AMAZON.COM INC
6.80%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.55%
BROADCOM LIMITED
5.30%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.78%
META PLATFORMS
4.01%
TESLA
2.99%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
1.61%
Diversification
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
87.93%
TEC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 199 total
63.83%
Characteristics
Compare
CHPS
TEC
| Provider | Global X | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD | Solactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.01% | 0.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2021 | May 9, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CHPS and TEC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or TEC?
As of June 11, 2026, CHPS has returned 57.94% year to date, while TEC has returned 12.84%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or TEC?
As of June 11, 2026, CHPS manages $373.90 M in assets, while TEC manages $4.81 B. TEC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and TEC managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. TEC is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Technology Leaders NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CHPS and TEC emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology. TEC is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or TEC?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$108.35 M in net flows, compared with +$510.34 M for TEC. TEC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and TEC compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while TEC has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and TEC?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED. TEC's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or TEC?
CHPS holds 7 securities, while TEC holds 191. On holdings count, TEC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CHPS and TEC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.