VS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while XCHP leans towards Technology. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.35% for XCHP. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 49.09% year-to-date with +$150 M in net flows, whereas XCHP is at 77.56% with +$278 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CHPS
XCHP
| AuM | $394.35 M | $380.38 M |
| Management Fees | 0.64% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.38% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHPS | -7.17% | +5.29% | +49.09% | +39.93% | +239.33% |
XCHP | -7.77% | +5.82% | +77.56% | +72.94% | +266.50% | |
| Flows | CHPS | +$22 M | +$8 M | +$150 M | +$159 M | +$205 M |
XCHP | +$47 M | +$82 M | +$278 M | +$271 M | +$318 M |
CHPS vs XCHP exposure
Countries
CHPS
USA
68.99%
Taiwan
17.93%
Netherlands
9.42%
XCHP
USA
83.35%
Other
16.65%
Sectors
CHPS
Technology
99.99%
XCHP
Technology
99.82%
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CHPS
NVIDIA Corp.
22.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.93%
Broadcom Inc.
13.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
10.83%
ASML Holding NV
9.42%
Lam Research Corp.
5.32%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.14%
Arm Holdings Plc
3.65%
KLA Corp.
3.23%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.61%
XCHP
NVIDIA Corp.
9.42%
Micron Technology, Inc.
8.89%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
8.22%
Broadcom Inc.
7.47%
Intel Corp.
5.09%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
4.65%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.65%
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.59%
Lam Research Corp.
4.27%
KLA Corp.
4.11%
Diversification
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
93.58%
XCHP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
61.36%
Characteristics
Compare
CHPS
XCHP
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD | NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.01% | 0.17% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 22, 2021 | September 6, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CHPS and XCHP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or XCHP?
As of October 28, 2026, CHPS has returned 49.09% year to date, while XCHP has returned 77.56%. XCHP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or XCHP?
As of October 28, 2026, CHPS manages $394.35 M in assets, while XCHP manages $380.38 M. CHPS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and XCHP managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. XCHP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do CHPS and XCHP emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Technology. XCHP is most exposed to Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or XCHP?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$150.13 M in net flows, compared with +$277.74 M for XCHP. XCHP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and XCHP compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while XCHP has an expense ratio of 0.38%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and XCHP?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Broadcom Inc.. XCHP's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Micron Technology, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or XCHP?
CHPS holds 18 securities, while XCHP holds 30. On holdings count, XCHP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CHPS and XCHP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.